Returns At New York Times (NYSE:NYT) Are On The Way Up
Returns At New York Times (NYSE:NYT) Are On The Way Up
There are a few key trends to look for if we want to identify the next multi-bagger. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. So on that note, New York Times (NYSE:NYT) looks quite promising in regards to its trends of return on capital.
如果我们想确定下一个多功能装袋机,有一些关键趋势需要关注。理想情况下,企业将表现出两种趋势;首先是增长 返回 论资本使用率(ROCE),其次是增加 金额 所用资本的比例。归根结底,这表明这是一家以不断提高的回报率对利润进行再投资的企业。因此,就资本回报率的趋势而言,《纽约时报》(纽约证券交易所代码:NYT)看起来相当乐观。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本使用回报率(ROCE):这是什么?
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for New York Times, this is the formula:
如果你以前没有与ROCE合作过,它会衡量公司从其业务中使用的资本中产生的 “回报”(税前利润)。要计算《纽约时报》的这个指标,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益 (EBIT) ¥(总资产-流动负债)
0.15 = US$290m ÷ (US$2.5b - US$554m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
0.15 = 2.9亿美元 ÷(25亿美元-5.54亿美元) (基于截至2023年9月的过去十二个月)。
Thus, New York Times has an ROCE of 15%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 7.7% generated by the Media industry.
因此,《纽约时报》的投资回报率为15%。就其本身而言,这是标准回报,但要比媒体行业产生的7.7%好得多。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for New York Times compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
上面你可以看到《纽约时报》当前的投资回报率与其先前的资本回报率相比如何,但从过去可以看出来的只有那么多。如果您有兴趣,可以在我们关于公司分析师预测的免费报告中查看分析师的预测。
So How Is New York Times' ROCE Trending?
那么《纽约时报》的ROCE趋势如何?
New York Times is showing promise given that its ROCE is trending up and to the right. More specifically, while the company has kept capital employed relatively flat over the last five years, the ROCE has climbed 24% in that same time. So it's likely that the business is now reaping the full benefits of its past investments, since the capital employed hasn't changed considerably. On that front, things are looking good so it's worth exploring what management has said about growth plans going forward.
鉴于其投资回报率呈上升和向右倾斜的趋势,《纽约时报》表现出希望。更具体地说,尽管该公司在过去五年中一直保持相对平稳的资本使用率,但同期投资回报率增长了24%。因此,由于所使用的资本没有太大变化,该企业现在很可能正在从过去的投资中获得全部收益。在这方面,情况看起来不错,因此值得探讨管理层对未来增长计划的看法。
The Key Takeaway
关键要点
To sum it up, New York Times is collecting higher returns from the same amount of capital, and that's impressive. And investors seem to expect more of this going forward, since the stock has rewarded shareholders with a 61% return over the last five years. So given the stock has proven it has promising trends, it's worth researching the company further to see if these trends are likely to persist.
总而言之,《纽约时报》正在从相同数量的资本中获得更高的回报,这令人印象深刻。投资者似乎对未来有更多期望,因为该股在过去五年中为股东提供了61%的回报。因此,鉴于该股已证明其趋势令人鼓舞,值得进一步研究该公司,看看这些趋势是否可能持续下去。
On the other side of ROCE, we have to consider valuation. That's why we have a FREE intrinsic value estimation on our platform that is definitely worth checking out.
在投资回报率的另一面,我们必须考虑估值。这就是为什么我们在平台上提供了免费的内在价值估算值的原因,这绝对值得一试。
While New York Times may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
尽管《纽约时报》目前可能无法获得最高的回报,但我们编制了一份目前股本回报率超过25%的公司名单。在这里查看这个免费清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。