The Five-year Underlying Earnings Growth at Perfect Group (SHSE:603059) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time
The Five-year Underlying Earnings Growth at Perfect Group (SHSE:603059) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time
The main aim of stock picking is to find the market-beating stocks. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. So we wouldn't blame long term Perfect Group Corp., Ltd (SHSE:603059) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 25% over a half decade. And the share price decline continued over the last week, dropping some 20%. But this could be related to the soft market, which is down about 9.4% in the same period.
选股的主要目的是找到击败市场的股票。但是,即使是最好的选股者也只能通过以下方式获胜 一些 选择。因此,我们不会责怪完美集团有限公司(SHSE: 603059)的长期股东怀疑他们的持股决定,该股在五年内下跌了25%。上周股价继续下跌,下跌了约20%。但这可能与疲软市场有关,同期疲软市场下跌了约9.4%。
Given the past week has been tough on shareholders, let's investigate the fundamentals and see what we can learn.
鉴于过去一周对股东来说很艰难,让我们调查一下基本面,看看我们能学到什么。
While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
尽管一些人继续教导高效市场假说,但事实证明,市场是反应过度的动态系统,投资者并不总是理性的。研究市场情绪如何随着时间的推移而变化的一种方法是研究公司股价与其每股收益(EPS)之间的相互作用。
During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Perfect Group actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 0.5% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.
在股价下滑的不幸五年中,完美集团的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年增长0.5%。鉴于股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑每股收益并不能很好地指导该期间的业务表现(可能是由于一次性的亏损或收益)。或者,市场此前可能非常乐观,因此尽管每股收益有所改善,但该股还是令人失望。
By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, five years ago. Having said that, we might get a better idea of what's going on with the stock by looking at other metrics.
通过浏览这些数字,我们可以假设五年前,市场对更高的增长抱有预期。话虽如此,通过查看其他指标,我们可能会更好地了解该股的情况。
The modest 0.9% dividend yield is unlikely to be guiding the market view of the stock. In contrast to the share price, revenue has actually increased by 8.3% a year in the five year period. So it seems one might have to take closer look at the fundamentals to understand why the share price languishes. After all, there may be an opportunity.
0.9%的适度股息收益率不太可能指导该股的市场观点。与股价形成鲜明对比的是,在五年期间,收入实际上每年增长8.3%。因此,看来人们可能必须仔细研究基本面才能理解股价下跌的原因。毕竟,可能有机会。
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下图描述了收入和收入随时间推移而发生的变化(点击图片即可显示确切的数值)。
We know that Perfect Group has improved its bottom line lately, but what does the future have in store? If you are thinking of buying or selling Perfect Group stock, you should check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
我们知道Perfect Group最近提高了利润,但是未来会怎样?如果您正在考虑买入或卖出Perfect Group的股票,则应查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。
What About Dividends?
分红呢?
When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, Perfect Group's TSR for the last 5 years was -22%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑两者之间的区别 股东总回报 (TSR) 和 股价回报。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息都经过再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。可以公平地说,股东总回报率为支付股息的股票提供了更完整的画面。碰巧的是,完美集团过去5年的股东总回报率为-22%,超过了前面提到的股价回报率。这在很大程度上是其股息支付的结果!
A Different Perspective
不同的视角
While it's never nice to take a loss, Perfect Group shareholders can take comfort that , including dividends,their trailing twelve month loss of 20% wasn't as bad as the market loss of around 26%. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it's worse than the annualised loss of 4% over the last half decade. Whilst Baron Rothschild does tell the investor "buy when there's blood in the streets, even if the blood is your own", buyers would need to examine the data carefully to be comfortable that the business itself is sound. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Perfect Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Even so, be aware that Perfect Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
尽管亏损从来都不是一件好事,但Perfect Group的股东可以放心,包括股息,他们过去十二个月的20%亏损没有26%左右的市场亏损那么严重。不幸的是,去年的表现可能预示着尚未解决的挑战,因为它比过去五年中4%的年化亏损还要糟糕。尽管罗斯柴尔德男爵确实告诉投资者 “街上有血时买入,即使血是你自己的”,但买家需要仔细检查数据,以确定业务本身是健全的。长期跟踪股价表现总是很有意思的。但是,为了更好地了解完美群组,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。即便如此,请注意,完美集团在我们的投资分析中显示了两个警告信号,您应该知道...
For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
对于那些喜欢寻找中奖投资的人来说,这份最近有内幕收购的成长型公司的免费名单可能只是门票。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.
请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。