share_log

Cassava Sciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SAVA) 7.1% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 59% as Well as Institutions

Cassava Sciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SAVA) 7.1% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 59% as Well as Institutions

木薯科学有限公司”s(纳斯达克股票代码:SAVA)上周亏损7.1%,既打击了持有59%的个人投资者,也打击了机构
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 05:29

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Cassava Sciences indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 36% ownership
  • 31% of Cassava Sciences is held by Institutions
  • 散户投资者对木薯科学的大量所有权表明,他们在管理和业务战略方面集体拥有更大的发言权
  • 共有25名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为36%
  • 31% 的木薯科学由机构持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了木薯科学公司(纳斯达克股票代码:SAVA),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,散户投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为59%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

While institutions, who own 31% shares weren't spared from last week's US$73m market cap drop, retail investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

尽管拥有31%股票的机构未能幸免于上周7300万美元的市值下跌,但散户投资者作为一个整体遭受的损失最大

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cassava Sciences.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于木薯科学的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:SAVA Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:SAVA 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cassava Sciences?

关于木薯科学,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Cassava Sciences does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cassava Sciences' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,木薯科学确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到木薯科学的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:SAVA Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:SAVA 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 6 日

Cassava Sciences is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.2%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.9% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Remi Barbier, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

木薯科学不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是贝莱德公司,所有权为7.2%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的5.9%和5.4%。第二大股东雷米·巴比尔也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Cassava Sciences

木薯科学的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Cassava Sciences, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$89m worth of the US$968m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有木薯科学公司的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值9.68亿美元的公司的价值8900万美元。很高兴看到内部人士进行一些投资,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 59% of Cassava Sciences. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有木薯科学公司59%的股份。有了这么多的所有权,散户投资者可以在影响股东回报的决策中共同发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使权力,对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并进行投票。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cassava Sciences better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Cassava Sciences (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解木薯科学,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了木薯科学的 2 个警告信号(1 个对我们来说不太合适!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发