share_log

AGNC Investment Corp. (NASDAQ:AGNC) Most Popular Amongst Individual Investors Who Own 59% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 40%

AGNC Investment Corp. (NASDAQ:AGNC) Most Popular Amongst Individual Investors Who Own 59% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 40%

AGNC投资公司(纳斯达克股票代码:AGNC)在拥有59%股份的个人投资者中最受欢迎,机构持有40%
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 09:34

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in AGNC Investment indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 25 shareholders own 29% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 个人投资者对AGNC Investment的大量所有权表明,他们在管理和业务战略中集体拥有更大的发言权
  • 前 25 名股东拥有公司 29% 的股份
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

A look at the shareholders of AGNC Investment Corp. (NASDAQ:AGNC) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 59% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看AGNC投资公司(纳斯达克股票代码:AGNC)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。个人投资者拥有公司的最大股份,拥有59%的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 40% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

同时,机构占公司股东的40%。机构通常拥有比较成熟的公司的股份,而内部人士拥有相当一部分小型公司的情况并不少见。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AGNC Investment.

在下图中,我们放大了AGNC Investment的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:AGNC Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
纳斯达克GS:AGNC 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AGNC Investment?

关于AGNC投资,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AGNC Investment. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AGNC Investment's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所见,机构投资者在AGNC投资中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看AGNC Investment的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:AGNC Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
纳斯达克GS:AGNC收益和收入增长 2024年2月6日

AGNC Investment is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.3%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.2% and 2.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

AGNC投资不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有权为8.3%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的5.2%和2.2%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现25位大股东共同拥有的股份不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of AGNC Investment

AGNC 投资的内部人士所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of AGNC Investment Corp. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$54m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有AGNC投资公司不到1%的股份。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值5400万美元的股票。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of AGNC Investment shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公众主要由个人投资者组成,共持有AGNC投资59%的股份。有了这么多的所有权,散户投资者可以在影响股东回报的决策中共同发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并行使投票权。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - AGNC Investment has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are significant) we think you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。以风险为例——AGNC Investment有4个警告信号(其中2个是重大警示信号),我们认为你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发