share_log

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) Three-year Losses Have Grown Faster Than Shareholder Returns Have Fallen, but the Stock Advances 3.2% This Past Week

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) Three-year Losses Have Grown Faster Than Shareholder Returns Have Fallen, but the Stock Advances 3.2% This Past Week

John Wiley & Sons(纽约证券交易所代码:WLY)三年期亏损的增长速度快于股东回报率的下降速度,但该股上周上涨了3.2%
Simply Wall St ·  02/13 07:43

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But if you try your hand at stock picking, your risk returning less than the market. We regret to report that long term John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (NYSE:WLY) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 35% in three years, versus a market return of about 16%. And more recent buyers are having a tough time too, with a drop of 25% in the last year.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力超过市场指数基金的回报。但是,如果你尝试选股,你的风险回报低于市场。我们遗憾地报告,John Wiley & Sons, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:WLY)的长期股东有过这样的经历,股价在三年内下跌了35%,而市场回报率约为16%。最近的买家也遇到了艰难时期,去年下降了25%。

While the last three years has been tough for John Wiley & Sons shareholders, this past week has shown signs of promise. So let's look at the longer term fundamentals and see if they've been the driver of the negative returns.

尽管过去三年对John Wiley & Sons的股东来说是艰难的,但过去一周显示出希望的迹象。因此,让我们来看看长期基本面,看看它们是否是负回报的驱动力。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者 沃伦·巴菲特描述了股价如何并不总是合理地反映企业的价值。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

During five years of share price growth, John Wiley & Sons moved from a loss to profitability. On the other hand, it reported a trailing twelve months loss, suggesting it isn't reliably profitable. Other metrics may better explain the share price move.

在五年的股价增长中,John Wiley & Sons从亏损转为盈利。另一方面,它报告了过去十二个月的亏损,这表明它无法可靠地盈利。其他指标可以更好地解释股价走势。

We note that the dividend seems healthy enough, so that probably doesn't explain the share price drop. John Wiley & Sons has maintained its top line over three years, so we doubt that has shareholders worried. A closer look at revenue and profit trends might yield insights.

我们注意到,股息似乎足够健康,因此这可能无法解释股价下跌的原因。John Wiley & Sons在三年内一直保持收入水平,因此我们怀疑这会让股东感到担忧。仔细研究收入和利润趋势可能会得出见解。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

公司的收入和收益(随着时间的推移)如下图所示(点击查看确切数字)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:WLY Earnings and Revenue Growth February 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:WLY 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 13 日

We like that insiders have been buying shares in the last twelve months. Even so, future earnings will be far more important to whether current shareholders make money. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think John Wiley & Sons will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

像我们一样,内部人士在过去的十二个月中一直在购买股票。即便如此,未来的收益对于当前股东是否赚钱将更为重要。因此,看看分析师认为John Wiley & Sons未来的收入(自由利润预测)是很有意义的。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for John Wiley & Sons the TSR over the last 3 years was -28%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

重要的是要考虑任何给定股票的股东总回报率和股价回报率。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息都经过再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。可以公平地说,股东总回报率为支付股息的股票提供了更完整的画面。我们注意到,对于John Wiley & Sons来说,过去3年的股东总回报率为-28%,好于上述股价回报率。这在很大程度上是其股息支付的结果!

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

John Wiley & Sons shareholders are down 22% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 21%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 4% per year over five years. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with John Wiley & Sons .

约翰·威利父子公司的股东今年下跌了22%(甚至包括股息),但市场本身上涨了21%。即使是优质股票的股价有时也会下跌,但我们希望在过于感兴趣之前看到企业基本指标的改善。遗憾的是,去年的业绩结束了糟糕的表现,股东在五年内每年面临4%的总亏损。我们意识到罗斯柴尔德男爵曾说过,投资者应该 “在街头流血时买入”,但我们警告说,投资者应首先确保他们购买的是高质量的企业。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在 John Wiley & Sons 身上发现的两个警告信号。

John Wiley & Sons is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

约翰·威利父子并不是内部人士唯一买入的股票。对于那些喜欢寻找获利投资的人来说,这份最近有内幕收购的成长型公司的免费清单可能就是入场券。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发