The Five-year Shareholder Returns and Company Earnings Persist Lower as China Cinda Asset Management (HKG:1359) Stock Falls a Further 4.0% in Past Week
The Five-year Shareholder Returns and Company Earnings Persist Lower as China Cinda Asset Management (HKG:1359) Stock Falls a Further 4.0% in Past Week
We think intelligent long term investing is the way to go. But that doesn't mean long term investors can avoid big losses. For example, after five long years the China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. (HKG:1359) share price is a whole 69% lower. We certainly feel for shareholders who bought near the top. And some of the more recent buyers are probably worried, too, with the stock falling 33% in the last year.
我们认为明智的长期投资是必经之路。但这并不意味着长期投资者可以避免巨额损失。例如,在漫长的五年之后,中国信达资产管理有限公司(HKG: 1359)的股价下跌了整整69%。对于在接近顶部买入的股东,我们当然有同感。一些最近的买家可能也感到担忧,该股去年下跌了33%。
Given the past week has been tough on shareholders, let's investigate the fundamentals and see what we can learn.
鉴于过去一周对股东来说很艰难,让我们调查一下基本面,看看我们能学到什么。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
虽然市场是一种强大的定价机制,但股价反映了投资者的情绪,而不仅仅是潜在的业务表现。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。
During the five years over which the share price declined, China Cinda Asset Management's earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 22% each year. Notably, the share price has fallen at 21% per year, fairly close to the change in the EPS. That suggests that the market sentiment around the company hasn't changed much over that time. So it's fair to say the share price has been responding to changes in EPS.
在股价下跌的五年中,中国信达资产管理的每股收益(EPS)每年下降22%。值得注意的是,股价每年下跌21%,与每股收益的变化非常接近。这表明,在那段时间内,公司周围的市场情绪没有太大变化。因此,可以公平地说,股价一直在应对每股收益的变化。
You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).
你可以在下面看到 EPS 是如何随着时间的推移而变化的(点击图片发现确切的值)。
We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on China Cinda Asset Management's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
我们很高兴地向大家报告,首席执行官的薪酬比资本相似公司的大多数首席执行官要适中。但是,尽管首席执行官的薪酬总是值得检查的,但真正重要的问题是公司未来能否增加收益。可能值得一看我们关于中国信达资产管理收益、收入和现金流的免费报告。
What About Dividends?
分红呢?
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of China Cinda Asset Management, it has a TSR of -54% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
重要的是要考虑任何给定股票的股东总回报率和股价回报率。股东总回报率包含任何分拆或贴现资本筹集的价值,以及任何股息,前提是股息是再投资的。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司来说,股东总回报率通常远高于股价回报率。就中国信达资产管理而言,其过去5年的股东总回报率为-54%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。因此,该公司支付的股息提高了 总 股东回报。
A Different Perspective
不同的视角
We regret to report that China Cinda Asset Management shareholders are down 28% for the year (even including dividends). Unfortunately, that's worse than the broader market decline of 15%. However, it could simply be that the share price has been impacted by broader market jitters. It might be worth keeping an eye on the fundamentals, in case there's a good opportunity. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 9% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for China Cinda Asset Management (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.
我们遗憾地报告,中国信达资产管理的股东今年下跌了28%(甚至包括股息)。不幸的是,这比整个市场15%的跌幅还要严重。但是,可能只是股价受到了更广泛的市场紧张情绪的影响。如果有很好的机会,可能值得关注基本面。不幸的是,去年的表现可能预示着尚未解决的挑战,因为它比过去五年中9%的年化亏损还要糟糕。我们意识到罗斯柴尔德男爵曾说过,投资者应该 “在街头流血时买入”,但我们警告说,投资者应首先确保他们购买的是高质量的企业。我发现将长期股价视为业务绩效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经为中国信达资产管理确定了两个警告信号(其中一个不容忽视),您应该注意这些信号。
If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.
如果你像我一样,那么你不会想错过这份业内人士正在收购的成长型公司的免费名单。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.
请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在香港交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。