share_log

Procaps Group S.A.'s (NASDAQ:PROC) Top Key Executive Ruben Minski Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 14% Last Week

Procaps Group S.A.'s (NASDAQ:PROC) Top Key Executive Ruben Minski Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 14% Last Week

Procaps Group S.A. 's(纳斯达克股票代码:PROC)高管鲁本·明斯基是最乐观的内部人士,他们的持股量上周增长了14%
Simply Wall St ·  02/17 08:37

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Procaps Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 60% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 对Procaps Group的重大内部控制意味着公司增长具有既得利益
  • 共有3名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,拥有60%的所有权
  • 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会

Every investor in Procaps Group S.A. (NASDAQ:PROC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Procaps Group S.A.(纳斯达克股票代码:PROC)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有60%所有权的个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$403m market cap following a 14% gain in the stock.

结果,内部人士上周得分最高,该公司的市值在股价上涨14%后达到4.03亿美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Procaps Group, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下表开始,更深入地研究Procaps Group的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:PROC Ownership Breakdown February 17th 2024
纳斯达克通用汽车:PROC 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 17 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Procaps Group?

关于Procaps Group,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活跃的小公司通常缺少机构投资者,但是没有机构投资者的大公司并不常见。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Procaps Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

机构为何不拥有股票,有多种解释。最常见的情况是,公司相对于所管理的资金来说规模太小,因此该机构不愿仔细研究该公司。基金经理也可能不拥有这只股票,因为他们不相信股票会表现良好。Procaps Group可能没有机构想要的那种过去的业绩,或者他们可能只是没有仔细研究该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:PROC Earnings and Revenue Growth February 17th 2024
纳斯达克通用汽车公司:PROC收益和收入增长 2024年2月17日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Procaps Group. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Ruben Minski (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 28% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. The second and third largest shareholders are Jose Gontovnik and Deseja Trust, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 16%.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Procaps集团进行有意义的投资。根据我们的数据,我们推断出最大股东是鲁本·明斯基(他还拥有最高关键高管的头衔),已发行股份的28%。当内部人士拥有公司大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人士扮演关键利益相关者的角色。第二和第三大股东是何塞·贡托夫尼克和德塞亚信托基金,持有与他们同等数量的股份,为16%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.

对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,3名最大股东通过其60%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Procaps Group

Procaps 集团的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Procaps Group S.A.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$240m stake in this US$403m business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有Procaps Group S.A. 一半以上的股份。这使他们能够有效控制公司。因此,他们在这笔4.03亿美元的业务中拥有2.4亿美元的股份。大多数人会认为这是积极的,显示出与股东的强烈一致性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Procaps Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Procaps集团16%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 7.5% stake in Procaps Group. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股权公司持有Procaps集团7.5%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资并不多。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售资本并将其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Procaps Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎拥有Procaps集团16%的股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Procaps Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Procaps Group (including 2 which shouldn't be ignored) .

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Procaps集团,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,你应该了解我们在Procaps集团发现的4个警告信号(包括2个不容忽视的警告信号)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发