share_log

Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 67% Ownership

Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 67% Ownership

Anker Innovations Limited(深圳证券交易所代码:300866)内部人士拥有大量股份,所有权为67%
Simply Wall St ·  02/26 02:45

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Anker Innovations' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 14% of Anker Innovations is held by Institutions
  • Anker Innovations拥有大量的内部所有权,这表明了公司扩张的固有利益
  • 56% 的业务由前两名股东持有
  • 14% 的 Anker Innovations 由机构持有

Every investor in Anker Innovations Limited (SZSE:300866) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 67% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Anker Innovations Limited(深圳证券交易所代码:300866)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。个人内部人士持有67%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.

由于该公司持有如此可观的股份,内部人士将极大地激励他们做出增值决策。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Anker Innovations.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Anker Innovations的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300866 Ownership Breakdown February 26th 2024
SZSE: 300866 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Anker Innovations?

关于安克创新,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

Anker Innovations already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Anker Innovations' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Anker Innovations已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Anker Innovations的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300866 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 26th 2024
SZSE: 300866 2024年2月26日收益和收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Anker Innovations. Meng Yang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 44% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Dongping Zhao and Wenlong Wu are the second and third largest shareholders. Dongping Zhao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of President.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Anker Innovations进行有意义的投资。孟阳目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的44%。赵东平和吴文龙分别拥有12%和4.3%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。第二大股东赵东平也恰好拥有总裁头衔。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Anker Innovations

Anker Innovations 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Anker Innovations Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. Insiders own CN¥22b worth of shares in the CN¥33b company. That's extraordinary! Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

内部人士似乎拥有Anker Innovations Limited一半以上的股票。这赋予了他们很大的力量。内部人士拥有这家33亿元人民币公司价值220亿元人民币的股份。太不寻常了!大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望了解他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Anker Innovations. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Anker Innovations拥有16%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对Anker Innovations有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Anker Innovations .

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在Anker Innovations中发现的两个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发