Jun Zhai Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 23%last Week
Jun Zhai Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 23%last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant insider control over Vanjee Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- 51% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 对Vanjee Technology的重大内部控制意味着公司增长中的既得利益
- 51% 的业务由前 2 名股东持有
- 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300552), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制了万吉科技股份有限公司(深圳证券交易所代码:300552),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,个别内部人士拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为54%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 23% gain.
结果,内部人士是上周23%涨幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Vanjee Technology.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Vanjee Technology的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vanjee Technology?
关于Vanjee Technology,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
Less than 5% of Vanjee Technology is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
只有不到5%的万吉科技股份由机构投资者持有。这表明一些基金将目光投向了该公司,但许多基金尚未购买该公司的股票。因此,如果公司本身能够随着时间的推移而有所改善,那么将来我们很可能会看到更多的机构买家。当一些大型机构想同时购买某只股票时,我们有时会看到股价上涨。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的历史可能有助于考虑是否会有更多的机构投资者想要这只股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Vanjee Technology. With a 46% stake, CEO Jun Zhai is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.0% and 1.8% of the stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Lin Yan Tian is also a Member of Corporate Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
对冲基金在Vanjee Technology的股票不多。首席执行官翟军持有46%的股份,是最大股东。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约5.0%和1.8%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股东林燕田也是公司董事会成员,这再次表明公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前两位股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。
Insider Ownership Of Vanjee Technology
万吉科技的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a CN¥2.4b stake in this CN¥4.5b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Vanjee科技有限公司的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。因此,他们在这项45亿元的业务中拥有24亿加元的股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 41% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司41%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Vanjee Technology you should know about.
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了一个你应该知道的Vanjee Technology的警告信号。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。