Emerald Holding's (NYSE:EEX) Returns On Capital Not Reflecting Well On The Business
Emerald Holding's (NYSE:EEX) Returns On Capital Not Reflecting Well On The Business
Ignoring the stock price of a company, what are the underlying trends that tell us a business is past the growth phase? Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. And from a first read, things don't look too good at Emerald Holding (NYSE:EEX), so let's see why.
忽略公司的股价,有哪些潜在趋势告诉我们企业已经过了增长阶段?衰落的企业通常有两个潜在趋势,首先是衰退 返回 论资本使用率(ROCE)和下降情况 基础 所用资本的比例。基本上,该公司的投资收入减少了,而且总资产也在减少。从第一次读起,翡翠控股(纽约证券交易所代码:EEX)的情况看起来并不太好,所以让我们看看为什么。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
了解资本使用回报率 (ROCE)
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Emerald Holding is:
对于那些不确定ROCE是什么的人,它衡量的是公司从其业务中使用的资本中可以产生的税前利润金额。翡翠控股公司的计算公式为:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益 (EBIT) ¥(总资产-流动负债)
0.022 = US$18m ÷ (US$1.1b - US$232m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).
0.022 = 1800万美元 ÷(11亿美元-2.32亿美元) (基于截至2023年9月的过去十二个月)。
Therefore, Emerald Holding has an ROCE of 2.2%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Media industry average of 8.1%.
因此,翡翠控股的投资回报率为2.2%。归根结底,这是一个低回报,其表现低于媒体行业8.1%的平均水平。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Emerald Holding compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Emerald Holding for free.
上面你可以看到Emerald Holding当前的投资回报率与其先前的资本回报率相比如何,但从过去可以看出来的只有那么多。如果你愿意,你可以免费查看报道翡翠控股的分析师的预测。
What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us
ROCE 的趋势能告诉我们什么
The trend of returns that Emerald Holding is generating are raising some concerns. To be more specific, today's ROCE was 8.0% five years ago but has since fallen to 2.2%. In addition to that, Emerald Holding is now employing 42% less capital than it was five years ago. The combination of lower ROCE and less capital employed can indicate that a business is likely to be facing some competitive headwinds or seeing an erosion to its moat. Typically businesses that exhibit these characteristics aren't the ones that tend to multiply over the long term, because statistically speaking, they've already gone through the growth phase of their life cycle.
翡翠控股的回报趋势引起了一些担忧。更具体地说,今天的投资回报率在五年前为8.0%,但此后已降至2.2%。除此之外,翡翠控股现在的资本比五年前减少了42%。较低的投资回报率和较少的资本使用相结合,可能表明企业可能面临一些竞争阻力或护城河受到侵蚀。通常,表现出这些特征的企业并不是那些往往会长期成倍增长的企业,因为从统计学上讲,它们已经经历了生命周期的增长阶段。
What We Can Learn From Emerald Holding's ROCE
我们可以从翡翠控股的投资回报率中学到什么
In short, lower returns and decreasing amounts capital employed in the business doesn't fill us with confidence. Investors haven't taken kindly to these developments, since the stock has declined 54% from where it was five years ago. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere.
简而言之,较低的回报率和业务中使用的资本金额减少并不能使我们充满信心。投资者对这些事态发展并不友善,因为该股已比五年前下跌了54%。由于这些领域的潜在趋势并不理想,我们会考虑将目光投向其他地方。
If you'd like to know more about Emerald Holding, we've spotted 2 warning signs, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.
如果你想进一步了解Emerald Holding,我们发现了 2 个警告标志,其中 1 个有点不愉快。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
对于那些喜欢投资稳健公司的人,可以查看这份资产负债表稳健和股本回报率高的公司的免费清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。