share_log

Insperity (NYSE:NSP) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 9.1% If They Invested Five Years Ago

Insperity (NYSE:NSP) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 9.1% If They Invested Five Years Ago

Insperity(纽约证券交易所代码:NSP)投资者如果在五年前进行投资,将蒙受9.1%的损失
Simply Wall St ·  03/11 04:22

The main aim of stock picking is to find the market-beating stocks. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in Insperity, Inc. (NYSE:NSP), since the last five years saw the share price fall 19%. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 13% in the last 90 days.

选股的主要目的是找到击败市场的股票。但是,即使是最好的选股者也只能通过以下方式获胜 一些 选择。目前,一些股东可能会质疑他们对Insperity, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:NSP)的投资,因为在过去五年中,股价下跌了19%。股东们最近的表现更加艰难,股价在过去90天中下跌了13%。

It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.

值得评估的是,该公司的经济状况是否与这些令人难以置信的股东回报步调一致,或者两者之间是否存在一些差距。所以我们就这么做吧。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

不可否认,市场有时是有效的,但价格并不总是能反映潜在的业务表现。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Insperity actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 7.2% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在股价下滑的不幸五年中,Insperity的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年增长7.2%。因此,每股收益似乎不是了解市场如何估值股票的好指南。或者,过去的增长预期可能不合理。

Generally speaking we'd expect to see stronger share price increases on the back of sustained EPS growth, but other metrics may hold a clue to why the share price performance is relatively modest.

总的来说,在每股收益持续增长的背景下,我们预计股价将出现更强劲的上涨,但其他指标可能为股价表现相对温和提供了线索。

In contrast to the share price, revenue has actually increased by 11% a year in the five year period. So it seems one might have to take closer look at the fundamentals to understand why the share price languishes. After all, there may be an opportunity.

与股价形成鲜明对比的是,在五年期间,收入实际上每年增长11%。因此,看来人们可能必须仔细研究基本面才能理解股价下跌的原因。毕竟,可能有机会。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下图描述了收入和收入随时间推移而发生的变化(点击图片即可显示确切的数值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NSP Earnings and Revenue Growth March 11th 2024
纽约证券交易所:NSP 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 11 日

This free interactive report on Insperity's balance sheet strength is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.

如果你想进一步调查Insperity的股票,这份关于Insperity资产负债表实力的免费互动报告是一个很好的起点。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of Insperity, it has a TSR of -9.1% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑两者之间的区别 股东总回报 (TSR) 和 股价回报。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息都经过再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。可以说,股东总回报率更全面地描述了股票产生的回报。就Insperity而言,在过去的5年中,其股东回报率为-9.1%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。而且,猜测股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧是没有好处的!

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

Investors in Insperity had a tough year, with a total loss of 12% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 33%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 1.8% per year over five years. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Insperity (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

Insperity的投资者经历了艰难的一年,总亏损了12%(包括股息),而市场涨幅约为33%。但是,请记住,即使是最好的股票有时也会在十二个月内表现不如市场。遗憾的是,去年的业绩结束了糟糕的表现,股东在五年内每年面临1.8%的总亏损。我们意识到罗斯柴尔德男爵曾说过,投资者应该 “在街头流血时买入”,但我们警告说,投资者应首先确保他们购买的是高质量的企业。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们已经确定了两个你应该注意的 Insperity 警告信号(1 个不容忽视)。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.

当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,请看一下我们预计收益将增加的这份免费公司名单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发