Insiders the Biggest Winners as Yangling Metron New Material Inc.'s (SZSE:300861) Market Cap Rises to CN¥14b
Insiders the Biggest Winners as Yangling Metron New Material Inc.'s (SZSE:300861) Market Cap Rises to CN¥14b
Key Insights
主要见解
- Yangling Metron New Material's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Yangling Metron New Material is 12%
- 美畅股份的重要内部持有表明公司扩张存在固有利益。
- 前两大股东持有该公司62%的股份。
- 美畅股份的机构持股比例为12%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Yangling Metron New Material Inc. (SZSE:300861), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 68% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
为了了解真正控制美畅股份公司的人,了解业务的所有权结构至关重要。拥有最大份额的群体是持有68%所有权的个人内部人员。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将受益最多(如果出现经济下滑,他们将失去最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥14b market cap following a 3.9% gain in the stock.
因此,内部人员作为中国140亿市值美畅股份在上周取得3.9%涨幅时得分最高。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Yangling Metron New Material.
下表中,我们将重点关注美畅股份不同的所有权组。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240312/0-6218716cb2fe9cbc4e187bc02cae664f-0-2ee25bf61983b770e6de1f1f75127100.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yangling Metron New Material?
机构投资者对于美畅股份有何看法?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Yangling Metron New Material already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Yangling Metron New Material's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
美畅股份的股份注册表上已有机构。实际上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要依赖所谓的机构投资者的验证。他们也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变他们对股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看美畅股份以下的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240312/0-6218716cb2fe9cbc4e187bc02cae664f-1-d10c335fadd81b5994fe74bdd4d423d9.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Yangling Metron New Material. The company's largest shareholder is Ying Wu, with ownership of 50%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Haibo Jia, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
我们注意到对于美畅股份,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。该公司的最大股东是吴英,持有50%的股份。为了获得背景信息,第二大股东持有约13%的流通股,第三大股东持有6.1%的股份。同时,第三大股东贾海波也是董事会成员。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Yangling Metron New Material
美畅股份内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Yangling Metron New Material Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥14b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥9.5b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
内部人员拥有美畅股份公司一半以上的股票。这使他们拥有很大的权力。鉴于它的市值约为140亿元人民币,这意味着内部人员拥有高达95亿元人民币的股票。看到这种投资水平是好的。您可以在这里查看这些内部人员是否出售了他们的股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Yangling Metron New Material. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
占有20%股份的普通公众,大多由个人投资者组成,对美畅股份有一定的影响力。虽然这种几乎四分之一的拥有权是可观的,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Yangling Metron New Material (1 is significant) that you should be aware of.
我很感兴趣看到到底谁拥有公司股份。但是为了真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了两个警告标志(其中一个很重要)值得注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。