Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SMCI) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.6% Over Last Week
Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SMCI) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.6% Over Last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Super Micro Computer's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Super Micro Computer的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
- 前12名股东拥有公司51%的股份
- 业内人士最近一直在抛售
If you want to know who really controls Super Micro Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ:SMCI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 70% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着超级微电脑公司(纳斯达克股票代码:SMCI),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为70%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 5.6% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 1,195% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
结果,在上周公司股价上涨5.6%之后,机构投资者获得了最大的回报。目前,一年的投资回报率为1,195%,上周的收益本来会非常受欢迎。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Super Micro Computer.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于超级微电脑的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Super Micro Computer?
关于超级微型计算机,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Super Micro Computer does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Super Micro Computer's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到,Super Micro Computer确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看超级微电脑的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Super Micro Computer is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.6% and 8.8% of the stock. Charles Liang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。超级微电脑不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,贝莱德公司是最大股东,已发行股份的11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.6%和8.8%的股份。第二大股东查尔斯·梁也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到51%的所有权由前12名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Super Micro Computer
超级微型计算机的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Super Micro Computer, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$9.7b stake in this US$65b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Super Micro Computer, Inc.合理比例的股份。很有意思的是,内部人士在这笔650亿美元的业务中拥有97亿美元的大量股份。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司15%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Super Micro Computer (including 2 which are a bit concerning) .
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解我们在超级微电脑上发现的4个警告信号(包括2个有点令人担忧的警告)。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。