Qinghua Fang Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301356) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 13%last Week
Qinghua Fang Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301356) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 13%last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 浙江天振科技拥有大量内部所有权,表明公司扩张有固有的利益
- 共有2位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为55%
- 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301356), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 68% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了浙江天振科技股份有限公司(SZSE: 301356),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有68%所有权的个人内部人士。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥406m last week.
显然,上周该公司的市值上涨了4.06亿元人民币之后,内部人士受益最大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于浙江天振科技的什么。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240316/0-78be0fa999ebc43c2fcab53e29386857-0-82e81545cc8fbff2d49055243198a422.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology?
关于浙江天振科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
机构持有浙江天振科技的很小股份。这表明该公司受到一些基金的关注,但目前在专业投资者中并不特别受欢迎。如果该公司正在增加收益,那可能表明它才刚刚开始引起这些财力雄厚的投资者的注意。当一些大型机构想同时购买某只股票时,我们有时会看到股价上涨。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的历史可能有助于考虑是否会有更多的机构投资者想要这只股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240316/0-78be0fa999ebc43c2fcab53e29386857-1-c8bd48dc4bc72b48a6752cde3a24452a.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology. With a 41% stake, CEO Qinghua Fang is the largest shareholder. With 14% and 7.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Caiqin Zhu and Anji Yahua Trading Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.
对冲基金在浙江天振科技的股份不多。首席执行官方清华持有41%的股份,是最大股东。朱彩勤和安吉亚华贸易合伙企业(有限合伙)分别拥有14%和7.5%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前两位股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology
浙江天振科技的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.6b, that means they have CN¥2.4b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有浙江天振科技有限公司一半以上的股份。这使他们能够有效控制公司。鉴于其市值为36亿元人民币,这意味着他们拥有价值24亿元人民币的股票。大多数人会认为这是积极的,显示出与股东的强烈一致性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
拥有24%的所有权的普通大众,主要是个人投资者,对浙江天振科技有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.5%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司7.5%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们发现了浙江天振科技的两个警告信号,在投资这里之前,你应该注意这些信号。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。