Here's What's Concerning About Greenfire Resources' (NYSE:GFR) Returns On Capital
Here's What's Concerning About Greenfire Resources' (NYSE:GFR) Returns On Capital
Ignoring the stock price of a company, what are the underlying trends that tell us a business is past the growth phase? Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. This indicates to us that the business is not only shrinking the size of its net assets, but its returns are falling as well. Having said that, after a brief look, Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) we aren't filled with optimism, but let's investigate further.
忽略公司的股价,有哪些潜在趋势告诉我们企业已经过了增长阶段?衰落的企业通常有两个潜在趋势,首先是衰退 返回 论资本使用率(ROCE)和下降情况 基础 所用资本的比例。这向我们表明,该企业不仅在缩小其净资产规模,而且其回报率也在下降。话虽如此,Greenfire Resources(纽约证券交易所代码:GFR)简短地看了一下,我们并不乐观,但让我们进一步调查一下。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本使用回报率(ROCE):这是什么?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Greenfire Resources is:
对于那些不知道的人来说,ROCE是衡量公司年度税前利润(其回报率)的指标,相对于该业务使用的资本。在 Greenfire Resources 上进行此计算的公式为:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益 (EBIT) ¥(总资产-流动负债)
0.049 = CA$50m ÷ (CA$1.2b - CA$168m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).
0.049 = 5000万加元 ÷(12亿加元-1.68亿加元) (基于截至2023年12月的过去十二个月)。
Thus, Greenfire Resources has an ROCE of 4.9%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Oil and Gas industry average of 14%.
因此,Greenfire Resources的投资回报率为4.9%。归根结底,这是一个低回报,其表现低于石油和天然气行业14%的平均水平。
While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you want to delve into the historical earnings , check out these free graphs detailing revenue and cash flow performance of Greenfire Resources.
虽然过去并不能代表未来,但了解一家公司的历史表现可能会有所帮助,这就是我们上面有这张图表的原因。如果您想深入研究历史收益,请查看这些免费图表,详细说明Greenfire Resources的收入和现金流表现。
What Can We Tell From Greenfire Resources' ROCE Trend?
我们可以从Greenfire Resources的投资回报率趋势中得出什么?
We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at Greenfire Resources. To be more specific, the ROCE was 11% one year ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last one year. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Greenfire Resources becoming one if things continue as they have.
我们对Greenfire Resources的资本回报率趋势有些担忧。更具体地说,一年前的投资回报率为11%,但此后已明显下降。在资本使用方面,该企业使用的资本量与当时大致相同。由于回报率下降且该企业的资产数量相同,这可能表明它是一家成熟的企业,在过去一年中没有太大的增长。因此,由于这些趋势通常不利于创建多袋机,因此,如果情况继续保持现状,我们就不会屏住呼吸等待 Greenfire Resources 合而为一。
What We Can Learn From Greenfire Resources' ROCE
我们可以从 Greenfire Resources 的 ROCE 中学到什么
In summary, it's unfortunate that Greenfire Resources is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 42% over the last year, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.
总而言之,不幸的是,Greenfire Resources从相同数量的资本中获得的回报较低。因此,该股去年下跌了42%也就不足为奇了,因此投资者似乎已经意识到了这些变化。除非这些指标转向更积极的轨迹,否则我们将把目光投向其他地方。
On a separate note, we've found 3 warning signs for Greenfire Resources you'll probably want to know about.
另一方面,我们发现了你可能想知道的Greenfire Resources的3个警告信号。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果你想寻找收益丰厚的稳健公司,可以免费查看这份资产负债表良好且股本回报率可观的公司名单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。