share_log

Vantone Neo Development Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600246) Market Cap Dropped CN¥794m Last Week; Private Companies Bore the Brunt

Vantone Neo Development Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600246) Market Cap Dropped CN¥794m Last Week; Private Companies Bore the Brunt

万通新开发集团有限公司's (SHSE: 600246) 上周市值下降了7.94亿元人民币;私营公司首当其冲
Simply Wall St ·  03/29 02:30

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Vantone Neo Development Group's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Institutions own 26% of Vantone Neo Development Group
  • Vantone Neo Development Group拥有大量的私营公司所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响。
  • 57% 的业务由前三名股东持有
  • 机构拥有万通新开发集团26%的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vantone Neo Development Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600246), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了万通新开发集团有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:600246),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为39%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

As market cap fell to CN¥13b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着上周市值跌至130亿元人民币,私营公司面临的亏损将超过该公司任何其他股东群体。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Vantone Neo Development Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Vantone Neo开发集团的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600246 Ownership Breakdown March 29th 2024
SHSE: 600246 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vantone Neo Development Group?

关于Vantone Neo开发集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Vantone Neo Development Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Vantone Neo Development Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在Vantone Neo开发集团中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Vantone Neo开发集团的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600246 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 29th 2024
SHSE: 600246 2024 年 3 月 29 日收益和收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Vantone Neo Development Group. Jiahua Dongfang Holdings (Group) Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. With 18% and 8.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Vantone Holdings Group and GLP Holdings LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Vantone Neo开发集团进行有意义的投资。佳华东方控股(集团)有限公司目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的30%。万通控股集团和GLP Holdings LP分别拥有18%和8.5%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前三名股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Vantone Neo Development Group

Vantone Neo 开发集团的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Vantone Neo Development Group Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥42m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,Vantone Neo开发集团有限公司内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。但是,内部人士有可能通过更复杂的结构获得间接利益。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值4200万元人民币的股票。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司34%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 39%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司39%的股份。私人公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过持有私营公司的股权而对上市公司感兴趣,而不是以个人身份获得权益。虽然很难得出任何广泛的中风结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个有待进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Vantone Neo Development Group you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现了一个你应该知道的Vantone Neo开发集团的警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发