RPC (NYSE:RES) Has Some Way To Go To Become A Multi-Bagger
RPC (NYSE:RES) Has Some Way To Go To Become A Multi-Bagger
What trends should we look for it we want to identify stocks that can multiply in value over the long term? Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, while the ROCE is currently high for RPC (NYSE:RES), we aren't jumping out of our chairs because returns are decreasing.
我们应该寻找哪些趋势?我们想确定可以长期价值成倍增长的股票?通常,我们希望注意到增长的趋势 返回 在资本使用率(ROCE)方面,除此之外,还在扩大 基础 所用资本的比例。如果你看到这一点,这通常意味着它是一家拥有良好商业模式和大量盈利再投资机会的公司。话虽如此,尽管RPC(纽约证券交易所代码:RES)目前的投资回报率很高,但我们并不是因为回报率下降而跳出困境。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本使用回报率(ROCE):这是什么?
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. The formula for this calculation on RPC is:
为了澄清一下你是否不确定,ROCE是评估公司从投资于其业务的资本中获得多少税前收入(按百分比计算)的指标。在 RPC 上进行此计算的公式为:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益 (EBIT) ¥(总资产-流动负债)
0.22 = US$255m ÷ (US$1.3b - US$152m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).
0.22 = 2.55亿美元 ÷(13亿美元-1.52亿美元) (基于截至2023年12月的过去十二个月)。
So, RPC has an ROCE of 22%. In absolute terms that's a great return and it's even better than the Energy Services industry average of 12%.
因此,RPC 的投资回报率为 22%。从绝对值来看,这是一个不错的回报,甚至比能源服务行业平均水平的12%还要好。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for RPC compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for RPC .
上面你可以看到RPC当前的投资回报率与其先前的资本回报率相比如何,但从过去可以看出来的只有那么多。如果你想了解分析师对未来的预测,你应该查看我们的免费RPC分析师报告。
What Can We Tell From RPC's ROCE Trend?
我们可以从RPC的投资回报率趋势中得出什么?
Over the past five years, RPC's ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. This tells us the company isn't reinvesting in itself, so it's plausible that it's past the growth phase. Although current returns are high, we'd need more evidence of underlying growth for it to look like a multi-bagger going forward.
在过去的五年中,RPC的投资回报率和已动用资本基本保持不变。这告诉我们该公司没有对自己进行再投资,因此它已经过了增长阶段是合理的。尽管目前的回报率很高,但我们需要更多潜在增长的证据,才能让它在未来看起来像一个多袋子。
The Bottom Line On RPC's ROCE
RPC 的 ROCE 的底线
Although is allocating it's capital efficiently to generate impressive returns, it isn't compounding its base of capital, which is what we'd see from a multi-bagger. And investors appear hesitant that the trends will pick up because the stock has fallen 34% in the last five years. Therefore based on the analysis done in this article, we don't think RPC has the makings of a multi-bagger.
尽管它正在有效地分配资本以产生可观的回报,但它并没有巩固其资本基础,正如我们从一个多口袋公司那里看到的那样。投资者似乎对趋势能否回升犹豫不决,因为该股在过去五年中下跌了34%。因此,根据本文中的分析,我们认为 RPC 不具备多装袋机的特点。
RPC does have some risks though, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for RPC that you might be interested in.
但是,RPC 确实存在一些风险,我们发现了 RPC 的 1 个警告信号,你可能会感兴趣。
If you'd like to see other companies earning high returns, check out our free list of companies earning high returns with solid balance sheets here.
如果您想看到其他公司获得高回报,请在此处查看我们的免费高回报且资产负债表稳健的公司名单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。