share_log

0.3% Earnings Growth Over 5 Years Has Not Materialized Into Gains for Qingdao Citymedia Co (SHSE:600229) Shareholders Over That Period

0.3% Earnings Growth Over 5 Years Has Not Materialized Into Gains for Qingdao Citymedia Co (SHSE:600229) Shareholders Over That Period

5年内0.3%的收益增长尚未转化为青岛城市媒体有限公司(SHSE: 600229)股东在此期间的收益
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 22:53

For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in Qingdao Citymedia Co,. Ltd. (SHSE:600229), since the last five years saw the share price fall 16%. And the share price decline continued over the last week, dropping some 8.7%.

对于许多人来说,投资的要点是产生比整个市场更高的回报。但是,几乎每个投资者都肯定会有表现过硬和表现不佳的股票。此时,一些股东可能会质疑他们对青岛城市媒体有限公司的投资。有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:600229),自过去五年股价下跌了16%以来。上周股价继续下跌,下跌了约8.7%。

With the stock having lost 8.7% in the past week, it's worth taking a look at business performance and seeing if there's any red flags.

由于该股在过去一周下跌了8.7%,值得一看业务表现,看看是否有任何危险信号。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者 沃伦·巴菲特描述了股价如何并不总是合理地反映企业的价值。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Qingdao Citymedia Co actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 1.7% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在股价下滑的不幸五年中,青岛城市媒体有限公司的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年增长1.7%。因此,每股收益似乎不是了解市场如何估值股票的好指南。或者,过去的增长预期可能不合理。

Given that EPS has increased, but the share price has fallen, it's fair to say that market sentiment around the stock has become more negative. Generally speaking, though, if the company can keep growing EPS then the share price will eventually follow.

鉴于每股收益增加了,但股价下跌了,可以公平地说,围绕该股的市场情绪变得更加消极。但是,总的来说,如果公司能够继续增长每股收益,那么股价最终将随之增长。

You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

你可以在下面看到 EPS 是如何随着时间的推移而变化的(点击图片发现确切的值)。

earnings-per-share-growth
SHSE:600229 Earnings Per Share Growth April 17th 2024
SHSE: 600229 每股收益增长 2024 年 4 月 17 日

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Qingdao Citymedia Co's earnings, revenue and cash flow.

可能值得注意的是,首席执行官的薪水低于类似规模公司的中位数。始终值得关注首席执行官的薪酬,但更重要的问题是公司多年来是否会增加收益。可能值得一看我们关于青岛城市媒体公司收益、收入和现金流的免费报告。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Qingdao Citymedia Co, it has a TSR of -4.6% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

除了衡量股价回报率外,投资者还应考虑股东总回报率(TSR)。基于股息再投资的假设,股东总回报率纳入了任何分拆或贴现资本筹集的价值以及任何股息。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司来说,股东总回报率通常远高于股价回报率。就青岛城市媒体有限公司而言,其过去5年的股东回报率为-4.6%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。这在很大程度上是其股息支付的结果!

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

Although it hurts that Qingdao Citymedia Co returned a loss of 9.5% in the last twelve months, the broader market was actually worse, returning a loss of 17%. Given the total loss of 0.9% per year over five years, it seems returns have deteriorated in the last twelve months. Whilst Baron Rothschild does tell the investor "buy when there's blood in the streets, even if the blood is your own", buyers would need to examine the data carefully to be comfortable that the business itself is sound. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Qingdao Citymedia Co , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管青岛城市媒体公司在过去十二个月中回报了9.5%的亏损令人痛心,但整个市场实际上更糟,亏损了17%。鉴于五年来每年的总损失为0.9%,在过去的十二个月中,回报率似乎有所下降。尽管罗斯柴尔德男爵确实告诉投资者 “街上有血时买入,即使血是你自己的”,但买家需要仔细检查数据,以确定业务本身是健全的。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向青岛城市媒体有限公司确定了3个警告信号,我们知道它们应该成为您投资过程的一部分。

Of course Qingdao Citymedia Co may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

当然,青岛城市媒体股份有限公司可能不是最好的买入股票。因此,您可能希望看到这批免费的成长股。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发