Individual Investors Who Hold 47% of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050) Gained 9.8%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 47% of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050) Gained 9.8%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over Chengdu RML Technology by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 28% of Chengdu RML Technology is held by insiders
- 个人投资者对成都RML科技的重大控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
- 前15名股东拥有公司50%的股份
- 成都RML科技28%的股份由内部人士持有
If you want to know who really controls Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制着成都瑞迈科技股份有限公司(深圳证券交易所代码:301050),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。而持有最大份额的群体是拥有47%所有权的个人投资者。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。
Following a 9.8% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but insiders who own 28% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
继上周股价上涨9.8%之后,个人投资者获利最多,但拥有28%股票的内部人士也将从涨幅中获益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Chengdu RML Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究成都RML科技的每种所有者。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240423/0-8ccdb954f4a0617eb19e8bd900c0e72e-0-8a3920b6fda9579ff51eb61aa990414a.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu RML Technology?
关于成都RML科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Chengdu RML Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Chengdu RML Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到,成都RML Technology确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看成都RML科技的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240423/0-8ccdb954f4a0617eb19e8bd900c0e72e-1-b78b0c750ad22559f0a0c2b82c90b810.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chengdu RML Technology. The company's CEO Jieru Deng is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. With 8.9% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Chencheng Han and Chongqing Yida Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对成都RML科技进行有意义的投资。该公司首席执行官邓洁如是最大股东,已发行股份为19%。韩晨成和重庆亿达企业管理合伙企业(有限合伙)分别占已发行股份的8.9%和4.7%,是第二和第三大股东。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前15位的公司合并所有权为50%,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu RML Technology
成都RML科技的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥2.4b worth of shares in the CN¥8.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,内部人士持有成都RML科技有限公司的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家85亿元人民币公司价值24亿元人民币的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司47%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 11%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据表明,私营公司持有该公司11%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司感兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问这张过去的收益、收入和现金流的交互式图表。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。