share_log

Time To Bet Against Bad Banks--Now That The Bank Term Funding Program Has Expired And Fed Rate Cuts Are On Hold

Time To Bet Against Bad Banks--Now That The Bank Term Funding Program Has Expired And Fed Rate Cuts Are On Hold

是时候押注不良银行了——既然银行定期融资计划已经到期,美联储的降息也处于暂停状态
Benzinga ·  05/09 09:48

Why Bet Against Banks Now?

为什么现在要押注银行?

Two main reasons. First, the Federal Reserve's new, post Silicon Valley Bank collapse assistance program, The Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), has expired. And second, the Fed's first rate cut—initially expected in the first quarter of this year—has been pushed off indefinitely due to persistent inflation. So banks still have to compete for depositors with higher yielding money market funds.

两个主要原因。首先,美联储在硅谷银行倒闭后的新援助计划,即银行定期融资计划(BTFP)已经到期。其次,由于持续的通货膨胀,美联储的首次降息——最初预计在今年第一季度——已被无限期推迟。因此,银行仍然必须争夺收益率更高的货币市场基金的存款人。

A Simpler And Cheaper Approach

一种更简单、更便宜的方法

Last year around this time, I used a banking expert's approach to try to figure out which regional banks were most likely to go bust. I made money betting against Bank of Hawaii Corporation (NYSE:BOH) and First Foundation, Inc. (NYSE:FFWM), and added more bearish positions after the crashes of PacWest Bancorp (now Banc of California) (NASDAQ:PACW) and Western Alliance Bancorporation (NYSE:WAL),

去年大约这个时候,我用银行专家的方法试图弄清楚哪些地区银行最有可能破产。我押注夏威夷银行公司(纽约证券交易所代码:BOH)和第一基金会公司(纽约证券交易所代码:FFWM)赚了钱,在PacWest Bancorp(现为加利福尼亚银行)(纳斯达克股票代码:PACW)和西方联盟银行(纽约证券交易所代码:WAL)暴跌后,我增加了更多看跌头寸,

Betting Against More Regional Banks In the wake of the $PACW and $WAL crashes, And after exiting bets against $BOH and $FFWM for gains of 80% and 200%, respectively. pic.twitter.com/UCdAoq8Kfv

— Portfolio Armor (@PortfolioArmor) May 4, 2023

押注更多地区银行在$PACW和$WAL暴跌之后,在退出对BOH和$FFWM的押注之后,分别获得了80%和200%的涨幅。pic.twitter.com/ucdaoq8KFV

— Portfolio Armor (@PortfolioArmor) 2023 年 5 月 4 日

I was going to pay the same analyst I used to update the spreadsheet we came up with with the latest data, but before doing so, I looked at the half dozen or so names that were ranked as the "worst" banks according to the banking expert's methodology, and checked how their share prices did over the last 12 months.

我本来要付钱给我以前更新电子表格的同一位分析师,但在这样做之前,我查看了根据银行业专家的方法被评为 “最差” 银行的六家左右的公司,并查看了它们的股价在过去12个月中的表现。

A couple had gone bust, but those were ones that were already in obvious trouble when we put the spreadsheet together. The others were all up significantly over the last 12 months. Apparently, they hadn't exhausted the BTFP after all.

一对夫妇破产了,但是当我们整理电子表格时,这些人已经遇到了明显的麻烦。在过去的12个月中,其他所有股均大幅上涨。显然,他们毕竟没有用尽BTFP。

So here's what I did instead. I went to Chartmill and ran this screen:

所以我改为这样做了。我去了 Chartmill 运行了这个屏幕:

  • GICS: Financial.

  • Has options

  • U.S. only.

  • Health Rating: < 2 (on a scale from 0-10).

  • Piotroski F-Score: 2 or less (on a scale from 0-9).

  • Technical Rating: 4 or less (on a scale of 0-10).

  • GICS:金融。

  • 有选项

  • 仅限美国。

  • 生命值等级:

  • 皮奥特罗斯基 F 分数:2 或以下(以 0-9 为标准)。

  • 技术评级:4 或以下(以 0-10 为标准)。

Then I did a bit of research on the names that came up, to see if there were any potential bullish indicators on these banks that the screens missed.

然后我对出现的名字做了一些研究,看看屏幕上是否有任何潜在的看涨指标。

An Ill-Fated Insider Purchase

一次命运不佳的内幕收购

There was a $25k insider purchase on one of these banks in March, but:

三月份,其中一家银行进行了2.5万美元的内幕收购,但是:

  • The shares are down ~28% since then.

  • And the bank missed its earnings in April.

  • 自那时以来,该股下跌了约28%。

  • 而且该银行未能在4月份实现收益。

So this insider doesn't appear to know much. And we've got two banks that look like real dogs for us to bet against.

因此,这位内部人士似乎知之甚少。而且我们有两家看起来像真狗的银行可供我们下注。

Read the rest here.

在这里阅读其余内容

If you want to stay in touch.

如果你想保持联系。

You can scan for optimal hedges for individual securities, find our current top ten names, and create hedged portfolios on our website. You can also follow Portfolio Armor on X here, or become a free subscriber to our trading Substack using the link below (we're using that for our occasional emails now).

您可以扫描个别证券的最佳套期保值,找到我们目前排名前十的股票,并在我们的网站上创建对冲投资组合。你也可以在此处的X上关注Portfolio Armor,或者使用下面的链接成为我们的交易Substack的免费订阅者(我们现在偶尔会用它来发送电子邮件)。

This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga's reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.

本文来自一位未付费的外部撰稿人。它不代表 Benzinga 的举报,也未就内容或准确性进行过编辑。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发