share_log

AGNC Investment Corp.'s (NASDAQ:AGNC) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 58% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Institutions

AGNC Investment Corp.'s (NASDAQ:AGNC) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 58% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Institutions

AGNC投资公司's(纳斯达克股票代码:AGNC)的最大所有者是个人投资者,持有58%的股份,而41%的股份由机构持有
Simply Wall St ·  05/23 15:03

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over AGNC Investment by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 30% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 个人投资者对AGNC投资的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 30% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of AGNC Investment Corp. (NASDAQ:AGNC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了AGNC投资公司(纳斯达克股票代码:AGNC),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为58%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 41% of the company's stockholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.

另一方面,机构占公司股东的41%。一般而言,随着公司的发展,机构将增加其所有权。相反,内部人士通常会随着时间的推移减少其所有权。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AGNC Investment.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关AGNC Investment的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:AGNC Ownership Breakdown May 23rd 2024
纳斯达克GS:AGNC所有权明细 2024年5月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AGNC Investment?

关于AGNC投资,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AGNC Investment. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AGNC Investment, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者在AGNC投资中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下AGNC Investment过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:AGNC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 23rd 2024
纳斯达克GS:AGNC收益和收入增长 2024年5月23日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in AGNC Investment. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对AGNC投资进行有意义的投资。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为8.9%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约5.0%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有2.3%的所有权。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of AGNC Investment

AGNC投资的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of AGNC Investment Corp. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$59m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有AGNC投资公司不到1%的股份。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值5900万美元的股票。看到董事会成员拥有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of AGNC Investment. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有AGNC投资58%的股份。这种所有权水平赋予了广大公众的投资者一定的权力来影响董事会组成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等关键政策决策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with AGNC Investment (at least 2 which are potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经在AGNC Investment中发现了4个警告信号(至少2个可能很严重),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发