share_log

With 72% Institutional Ownership, Old Republic International Corporation (NYSE:ORI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 72% Institutional Ownership, Old Republic International Corporation (NYSE:ORI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

Old Republic International Corporation(纽约证券交易所代码:ORI)拥有72%的机构所有权,是大公司中的最爱
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 14:50

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Old Republic International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 高机构所有权意味着旧共和国国际的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 51% 的业务由前 12 名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近一直在买入

Every investor in Old Republic International Corporation (NYSE:ORI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 72% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

旧共和国国际公司(纽约证券交易所代码:ORI)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。机构拥有72%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,投资于公司的机构资金中有很大一部分通常是对公司未来的巨大信任票。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Old Republic International.

在下图中,我们放大了旧共和国国际的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ORI Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:ORI 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Old Republic International?

关于旧共和国国际,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Old Republic International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Old Republic International, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

旧共和国国际已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下旧共和国国际过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ORI Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:ORI 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 24 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Old Republic International. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对旧共和国国际进行有意义的投资。贝莱德公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的12%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约11%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有7.3%的所有权。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到51%的所有权由前12名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Old Republic International

旧共和国国际的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that Old Republic International Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$54m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息表明,旧共和国国际公司的内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值5400万美元的股票。很高兴看到董事会成员拥有股票,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Old Republic International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有20%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对旧共和国国际有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Old Republic International better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Old Republic International is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解旧共和国国际,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,Old Republic International在我们的投资分析中显示了1个警告信号,您应该知道...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发