share_log

New World Development Company Limited's (HKG:17) Stock Price Dropped 6.6% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

New World Development Company Limited's (HKG:17) Stock Price Dropped 6.6% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

新世界发展有限公司(HKG: 17)股价上周下跌6.6%;私人公司不会高兴
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 18:49

Key Insights

关键见解

  • New World Development's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 15% of New World Development is held by Institutions
  • 新世界发展拥有大量私营公司所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
  • 51% 的业务由前 2 名股东持有
  • 新世界发展的15%由机构持有

A look at the shareholders of New World Development Company Limited (HKG:17) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看新世界发展有限公司(HKG: 17)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为45%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And following last week's 6.6% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.

继上周股价下跌6.6%之后,私营公司遭受的损失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about New World Development.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于新世界发展的什么。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:17 Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2024
SEHK: 17 股权明细 2024 年 5 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About New World Development?

关于新世界发展,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that New World Development does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of New World Development, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,新世界发展确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看新世界发展过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:17 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2024
SEHK: 17 2024年5月24日的收益和收入增长

New World Development is not owned by hedge funds. Chow Tai Fook Capital Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 45% of shares outstanding. With 5.7% and 2.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Ashmore Investment Management Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.

新世界发展不归对冲基金所有。周大福资本有限公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的45%。贝莱德公司和阿什莫尔投资管理有限公司分别拥有5.7%和2.4%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.

对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前两名股东通过其51%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of New World Development

新世界发展的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of New World Development Company Limited in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own HK$83m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己的名义拥有新世界发展有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,内部人士有可能通过更复杂的结构获得间接利益。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值8300万港元的股票。很高兴看到董事会成员拥有股票,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司39%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司的政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 45%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有45%的已发行股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for New World Development you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的 3 个新世界发展的警告信号,其中两个有点令人担忧。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发