share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Sable Offshore Corp. (NYSE:SOC) With 32% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Sable Offshore Corp. (NYSE:SOC) With 32% Ownership

机构投资者非常依赖拥有32%所有权的Sable Offshore Corp.(纽约证券交易所代码:SOC)
Simply Wall St ·  05/25 09:18

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Sable Offshore's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 高机构所有权意味着Sable Offshore的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 52% 的业务由前四名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近买了

A look at the shareholders of Sable Offshore Corp. (NYSE:SOC) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 32% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Sable Offshore Corp.(纽约证券交易所代码:SOC)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有32%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Last week's 6.3% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 44% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周6.3%的涨幅意味着,尽管该公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,但机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。目前,一年期股东回报率为44%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sable Offshore.

在下图中,我们放大了Sable Offshore的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SOC Ownership Breakdown May 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SOC 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sable Offshore?

关于Sable Offshore,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Sable Offshore does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sable Offshore, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Sable Offshore确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Sable Offshore过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SOC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SOC 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 25 日

It would appear that 19% of Sable Offshore shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. With a 17% stake, CEO James Flores is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 13%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

看来Sable Offshore有19%的股票由对冲基金控制。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。首席执行官詹姆斯·弗洛雷斯持有17%的股份,是最大股东。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的15%和13%。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步来看,我们发现前四名股东持有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中拥有有意义的发言权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of Sable Offshore

Sable 离岸公司的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Sable Offshore Corp.. Insiders own US$234m worth of shares in the US$804m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有Sable Offshore Corp的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家价值8.04亿美元的公司价值2.34亿美元的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sable Offshore. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有20%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Sable Offshore有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sable Offshore better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Sable Offshore you should be aware of, and 3 of them can't be ignored.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解Sable Offshore,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的4个Sable Offshore警告信号,其中3个不容忽视。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发