share_log

With 84% Ownership, Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 84% Ownership, Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Stifel Financial Corp.(纽约证券交易所代码:SF)拥有84%的所有权,拥有强大的机构支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/26 10:06

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Stifel Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Stifel Financial的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 51% 的业务由前 15 名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

Every investor in Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Stifel Financial Corp.(纽约证券交易所代码:SF)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有84%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,投资于公司的机构资金中有很大一部分通常是对公司未来的巨大信任票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stifel Financial.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Stifel Financial的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SF Ownership Breakdown May 26th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SF 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stifel Financial?

关于Stifel Financial,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stifel Financial. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Stifel Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所见,机构投资者持有Stifel Financial的相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Stifel Financial的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SF Earnings and Revenue Growth May 26th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SF 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 26 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Stifel Financial is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Ronald Kruszewski, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。Stifel Financial不归对冲基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的10%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约8.8%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有5.9%的所有权。此外,我们发现首席执行官罗纳德·克鲁谢夫斯基以其名义分配了1.3%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前15位的公司合并所有权为51%,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Stifel Financial

Stifel Financial 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Stifel Financial Corp.. Insiders own US$287m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Stifel Financial Corp的股份。内部人士拥有价值2.87亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益非常一致。尽管如此,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Stifel Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Stifel Financial12%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Stifel Financial that you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了Stifel Financial的两个警告信号,你应该注意这些信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发