share_log

Institutional Investors in Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD) See US$242m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD) See US$242m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

沃克和邓禄普公司(纽约证券交易所代码:WD)的机构投资者上周的市值下降了2.42亿美元,尽管长期收益使他们受益。
Simply Wall St ·  05/26 10:23

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Walker & Dunlop's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 极高的机构持有意味着Walker&Dunlop的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 前八大股东持有该业务的51%。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要想真正了解Walker&Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD)谁在掌控,了解业务的所有权结构是十分重要的。持有公司84%所有权的机构是拥有最大份额的群体。换句话说,该群体将会从他们对该公司的投资中获得最大的收益(或者最大的亏损)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$3.2b last week. However, the 34% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

该公司市值上周下跌至3.2亿美元后,机构投资者是受到最大影响的群体。然而,34%的股东一年的回报或许有助于减轻他们的痛苦。然而,我们会假设他们将会密切关注未来的弱点。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Walker & Dunlop, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入挖掘一下Walker&Dunlop的每一种所有者,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:WD Ownership Breakdown May 26th 2024
NYSE:WD所有权分布2024年5月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Walker & Dunlop?

机构持股告诉我们什么关于Walker&Dunlop?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Walker & Dunlop does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Walker & Dunlop's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Walker&Dunlop确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司的相当一部分股票。这表明专业投资者中有一些可信度。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果多个机构同时改变他们对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得看一下Walker&Dunlop下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:WD Earnings and Revenue Growth May 26th 2024
NYSE:WD收益和营收增长2024年5月26日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Walker & Dunlop is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO William Walker is the owner of 2.7% of the company's shares.

机构投资者占据公司的50%以上,因此他们可能会共同影响公司董事会的决策。Walker&Dunlop不是由对冲基金持有的。目前,BlackRock, Inc.是该公司的最大股东,持有16%的流通股。作为背景,第二大股东持有大约11%的流通股,其次是第三大股东持有5.9%的股份。此外,CEO William Walker拥有该公司2.7%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Walker & Dunlop

Walker&Dunlop的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Walker & Dunlop, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$170m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到,内部人拥有Walker&Dunlop,Inc.的股份。内部人持有US$170m的实质性股份。大多数人会将此视为真正的好事。如果您想探究内部人的利益相关性,可以点击此处查看内部人是否在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众——包括散户投资者——拥有该公司11%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽略。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Walker & Dunlop has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我觉得了解一个公司的真正全部信息非常有趣,但要真正获得洞见,我们还需要考虑其他信息。拿风险为例——Walker&Dunlop有四个警示信号,我们认为您应该了解一下这些信息。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发