share_log

TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) Institutional Investors Lost 9.4% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) Institutional Investors Lost 9.4% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

TAL教育集团(纽约证券交易所代码:TAL)的机构投资者上周下跌9.4%,但受益于长期涨势
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 07:37

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies TAL Education Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insider ownership in TAL Education Group is 31%
  • 高机构所有权意味着TAL Education Group的股价对其交易行为敏感
  • 前11名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • TAL教育集团的内部所有权为31%

A look at the shareholders of TAL Education Group (NYSE:TAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 41% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看TAL教育集团(纽约证券交易所代码:TAL)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。机构拥有41%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 9.4% last week. However, the 95% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投资亏损是任何股东都不喜欢的事情,更不用说上周持股价值下降9.4%的机构投资者了。但是,股东95%的一年期回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TAL Education Group.

在下图中,我们放大了TAL教育集团的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TAL Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
纽约证券交易所:TAL 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TAL Education Group?

关于TAL教育集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

TAL Education Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TAL Education Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

TAL教育集团已经在股份登记处有机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看TAL教育集团的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TAL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
纽约证券交易所:TAL 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 27 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in TAL Education Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Bangxin Zhang with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.2% and 3.0% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yachao Liu is also Chief Operating Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

对冲基金在TAL教育集团的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官张邦新,其已发行股票的27%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约4.2%和3.0%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股东刘亚超再次担任首席运营官,这表明公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现排名前11位的合计拥有该公司的50%所有权,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of TAL Education Group

TAL 教育集团的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of TAL Education Group. Insiders own US$2.3b worth of shares in the US$7.3b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有TAL教育集团合理比例的股份。内部人士拥有这家价值73亿美元的公司价值23亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司28%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发