Bilibili Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BILI) Latest 13% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Bilibili Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BILI) Latest 13% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Bilibili's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders own 21% of Bilibili
- 鉴于机构在该股票中持有大量股份,哔哩哔哩的股票价格可能会容易受到他们的交易决策的影响。
- 前11大股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
- 内部人员拥有哔哩哔哩 21% 的股份。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Bilibili Inc. (NASDAQ:BILI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
为了了解哔哩哔哩股份真正的掌控者,我们需要了解其所有权结构。我们可以看到机构在公司中拥有44%的股权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,机构最有可能获益最大(如果出现经济下行,机构也会蒙受最大损失)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$891m. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 17% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Bilibili, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,当市值下降了8.91亿美元后,机构投资者遭受了最高的损失。这些投资者可能尤其关注当前的损失,因为对于股东们来说,最近一年的损失已经达到了17%。机构通常被称为“市场操纵者”,他们对任何股票价格动态的影响力非常大。因此,如果下跌趋势持续,机构可能会面临卖出哔哩哔哩的压力,这可能会对个人投资者产生负面影响。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bilibili.
我们可以仔细观察不同类型的股东告诉我们哔哩哔哩的情况。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bilibili?
哔哩哔哩的机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Bilibili already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Bilibili, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
哔哩哔哩已经有机构持股,这些机构在公司中拥有相当大的股份。这表明专业投资者对公司的声誉比较认可。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图出售一只股票,通常会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查哔哩哔哩过去的盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要注意其他因素。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Bilibili. The company's CEO Rui Chen is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.6% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Yi Xu is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
套保基金没有持有哔哩哔哩的太多股票。公司的CEO Rui Chen 是最大的股东,拥有12%的流通股。第二大股东持有的流通股约为11%,第三大股东持有6.6%的流通股。有趣的是,第三大股东徐轶也是董事会成员,这一点再次表明公司的顶级股东持有相当大的内部股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在深入挖掘后,我们发现前11名股东在该公司拥有50%的股份,这意味着没有单一的股东对公司拥有显著的控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Bilibili
哔哩哔哩的内部股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Bilibili Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$1.2b stake in this US$5.8b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起来内部人员拥有哔哩哔哩相当大的股份。很有趣的是,内部人员在这家58亿美元的公司中拥有重要的12亿美元的股份。大多数人认为,尤其是在这样一家规模的公司中,这表明内部人员与股东有很高的一致性。您可以在此处查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散户投资者在内的普通公众拥有该公司24%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能必然掌控局面,但它肯定会对公司经营方式产生真正的影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 11% of Bilibili stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
目前,公共公司拥有哔哩哔哩的11%的股份。这可能是一项战略性利益,并且这两家公司可能存在相关业务利益。可能是它们已经进行分离。这个持有可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Bilibili that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有某家公司的不同群体值得注意,但更重要的是要考虑其他因素。例如,我们已经为哔哩哔哩发现了1个警告信号,您应该注意它。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。