share_log

Individual Investors Are Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.'s (SGX:NO4) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by S$68m Last Week

Individual Investors Are Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.'s (SGX:NO4) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by S$68m Last Week

个人投资者是 Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.s(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:NO4)最大的所有者在上周市值上涨6800万新元后获得了回报
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 18:13

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Dyna-Mac Holdings' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 55% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • Dyna-Mac Holdings拥有大量个人投资者所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响
  • 55% 的业务由前 2 名股东持有
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd. (SGX:NO4), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 32% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:NO4),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的群体是拥有32%所有权的个人投资者。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, individual investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 19% gain.

因此,个人投资者是上周19%涨幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Dyna-Mac Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Dyna-Mac Holdings的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:NO4 Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
新加坡交易所:NO4 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dyna-Mac Holdings?

关于Dyna-Mac控股公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

Since institutions own only a small portion of Dyna-Mac Holdings, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

由于机构仅拥有Dyna-Mac Holdings的一小部分股份,因此许多机构可能没有花太多时间考虑该股。但很明显,有些人有;他们很喜欢它,足以买进。如果该公司正在增加收益,那可能表明它才刚刚开始引起这些财力雄厚的投资者的注意。当一些大型机构想同时购买某只股票时,我们有时会看到股价上涨。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的历史可能有助于考虑是否会有更多的机构投资者想要这只股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:NO4 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
新加坡证券交易所:第四季度收益和收入增长 2024年5月27日

Dyna-Mac Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Estate of Lim Tze Jong, with ownership of 32%. Hanwha Ocean Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 23% of common stock, and Boon Hwee Teo holds about 6.1% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Ah Cheng Lim, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

Dyna-Mac Holdings不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是林子钟的遗产,所有权为32%。韩华海洋株式会社是第二大股东,拥有23%的普通股,Boon Hwee Teo持有该公司约6.1%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官阿成林以其名义分配了1.1%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细的研究表明,有两位大股东通过其55%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Dyna-Mac Holdings

Dyna-Mac Holdings 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just S$429m, and insiders have S$34m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Dyna-Mac Holdings Ltd的股份。它的市值仅为4.29亿新元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值3400万新元的股票。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众——包括散户投资者——拥有该公司32%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 32%, of the Dyna-Mac Holdings stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

私人公司似乎拥有Dyna-Mac Holdings股票的32%。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 27% of Dyna-Mac Holdings. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我们看来,上市公司拥有Dyna-Mac控股公司27%的股份。这可能是战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。可能是他们已经消失了。这一裁定可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜欢查看收入增长的历史。您也可以,通过访问此详细图表中的这张免费的历史收入和收益图表。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发