Institutional Investors in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) See CN¥728m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) See CN¥728m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Jushri Technologies' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 考虑到机构对Jushri Technologies股票的大规模持股,他们的交易决策可能会对其股价造成影响。
- 共有12名投资者拥有公司的大部分股权,拥有50%的所有权。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
Every investor in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762)的每位投资者都应该认识到最强大的股东群体。该集团持有公司最多的股份数量,准确地说为42%,就是机构。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.7% in value last week. However, the 38% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
股东不喜欢在投资中亏损,特别是上周看到其持股价值下跌了6.7%的机构投资者。然而,一年38%的股东回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。然而,他们应该注意将来进一步的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Jushri Technologies.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对Jushri Technologies能告诉我们什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jushri Technologies?
机构所有权告诉我们什么关于Jushri Technologies?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Jushri Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jushri Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Jushri Technologies已经有机构占据了股东名册,他们持有公司一个可观的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师们已经研究了这支股票,他们喜欢它。但像其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一支股票,股价大幅下跌是很常见的。因此,审查Jushri Technologies过去的盈利轨迹(如下)是值得的。当然,还有其他要考虑的因素。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jushri Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is Shanghai Shuangyou Information Technology Co., Ltd., with ownership of 18%. AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.6% of common stock, and Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Endowment Arm holds about 4.2% of the company stock.
对于Jushri Technologies而言,对冲基金并没有太多的持股。该公司最大的股东是上海双友信息技术有限公司,占有18%的股份。AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd.是第二大股东,持有普通股的8.6%,上海微系统及信息技术研究所的捐赠部门持有公司股票的约4.2%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我们对所有权的深入研究表明,前12名股东合计拥有50%的持股,意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Jushri Technologies
Jushri Technologies内部股权情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我们的数据无法确认董事会成员是否持有个人股份。董事会成员至少持有一些个人股份是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行动是检查CEO的薪资。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公众,包括零售投资者,在该公司拥有40%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管拥有的份额相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们可以看到私人公司拥有已发行股份的18%。这值得更深入地研究。如果相关方,例如内部人员,对其中一家私人公司感兴趣,那么应在年度报告中披露这一点。私人公司也可能对公司具有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Jushri Technologies , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑公司各个股东群体非常重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,投资风险这个永恒的威胁。我们已经确认了Jushri Technologies的1个警告信号,了解这些信号应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。