share_log

Is Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) Using Too Much Debt?

Seadrill(纽约证券交易所代码:SDRL)是否使用过多的债务?
Simply Wall St ·  05/28 06:47

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Seadrill Limited (NYSE:SDRL) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

传奇基金经理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾经说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久的资本损失。”因此,很明显,当你考虑任何给定股票的风险时,你需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务会使公司陷入困境。与许多其他公司一样,Seadrill Limited(纽约证券交易所代码:SDRL)也使用债务。但真正的问题是这笔债务是否使公司面临风险。

When Is Debt A Problem?

债务何时会成为问题?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

债务为企业提供帮助,直到企业难以用新的资本或自由现金流还清债务。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷款人可以控制业务。但是,更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东,以支撑其资产负债表。话虽如此,最常见的情况是公司合理地管理债务,而且对自己有利。在考虑企业使用多少债务时,要做的第一件事是将其现金和债务放在一起考虑。

What Is Seadrill's Net Debt?

Seadrill 的净负债是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 Seadrill had debt of US$609.0m, up from US$358.0m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$584.0m, its net debt is less, at about US$25.0m.

您可以点击下图查看更多详情,该图片显示,截至2024年3月,Seadrill的债务为6.090亿美元,高于一年的3.58亿美元。但是,由于其现金储备为5.84亿美元,其净负债较少,约为2500万美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:SDRL Debt to Equity History May 28th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SDRL 债务与股本比率历史记录 2024 年 5 月 28 日

A Look At Seadrill's Liabilities

看看 Seadrill 的负债

The latest balance sheet data shows that Seadrill had liabilities of US$355.0m due within a year, and liabilities of US$840.0m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$584.0m and US$211.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$400.0m.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,Seadrill的负债为3.55亿美元,之后到期的负债为8.40亿美元。另一方面,它有一年内到期的现金为5.84亿美元,还有价值2.11亿美元的应收账款。因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款总额4亿美元。

Of course, Seadrill has a market capitalization of US$3.53b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward. But either way, Seadrill has virtually no net debt, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

当然,Seadrill的市值为35.3亿美元,因此这些负债可能是可以控制的。但是,有足够的负债,我们肯定会建议股东今后继续监督资产负债表。但是无论哪种方式,Seadrill几乎没有净负债,因此可以公平地说,它没有沉重的债务负担!

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过以下方法来衡量公司的债务负担与其盈利能力:将其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),并计算其利息和税前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的难易程度。这样,我们既考虑债务的绝对数量,也考虑为债务支付的利率。

With debt at a measly 0.047 times EBITDA and EBIT covering interest a whopping 16.1 times, it's clear that Seadrill is not a desperate borrower. Indeed relative to its earnings its debt load seems light as a feather. Better yet, Seadrill grew its EBIT by 326% last year, which is an impressive improvement. If maintained that growth will make the debt even more manageable in the years ahead. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Seadrill can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

债务仅为息税折旧摊销前利润的0.047倍,息税前利润覆盖利息高达16.1倍,很明显,Seadrill并不是一个绝望的借款人。事实上,相对于其收益,其债务负担似乎轻如鸿毛。更好的是,Seadrill去年的息税前利润增长了326%,这是一个令人印象深刻的改善。如果这种增长得以维持,将使未来几年的债务更加易于管理。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但最终,该业务的未来盈利能力将决定Seadrill能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last two years, Seadrill reported free cash flow worth 19% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

最后,公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,不能用会计利润偿还债务。因此,我们总是检查息税前利润中有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去的两年中,Seadrill公布的自由现金流占其息税前利润的19%,确实很低。这种低迷的现金转换水平削弱了其管理和偿还债务的能力。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Seadrill's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But truth be told we feel its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow does undermine this impression a bit. Looking at the bigger picture, we think Seadrill's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Seadrill, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

令人高兴的是,Seadrill令人印象深刻的利息保障意味着它在债务上占了上风。但说实话,我们认为它将息税前利润转换为自由现金流确实稍微破坏了这种印象。从大局来看,我们认为Seadrill使用债务似乎相当合理,我们对此并不担心。毕竟,合理的杠杆可以提高股本回报率。随着时间的推移,股价往往会跟随每股收益,因此,如果你对Seadrill感兴趣,你很可能想点击这里查看其每股收益历史的交互式图表。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果你有兴趣投资能够在没有债务负担的情况下增加利润的企业,请查看这份资产负债表上有净现金的成长型企业的免费清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发