share_log

Is MasterBrand (NYSE:MBC) Using Too Much Debt?

Is MasterBrand (NYSE:MBC) Using Too Much Debt?

MasterBrand(纽约证券交易所代码:MBC)是否使用过多的债务?
Simply Wall St ·  05/29 08:00

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, MasterBrand, Inc. (NYSE:MBC) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

沃伦·巴菲特称:“波动性与风险远非同义词”。因此当你考虑这只股票有多大风险时,必须考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会导致公司破产。重要的是,MasterBrand, Inc.(NYSE:MBC)确实存在债务。但更重要的问题是:这笔债务产生了多大的风险?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什么时候负债才是一个问题?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

债务可以帮助业务,直到业务遇到难以用新的资本或者自由现金流来还清债务的时候。如果公司无法满足偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能什么也拿不到。但更常见(但仍然痛苦)的情况是以低价筹集新的股本资本,从而永久稀释股东持有的股份。话虽这么说,最常见的情况是公司合理控制其债务,并使之发挥作用。在考虑一个公司使用的债务量时,首先要做的是看看其现金和债务的结合。

How Much Debt Does MasterBrand Carry?

MasterBrand承担了多少债务?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that MasterBrand had debt of US$708.0m at the end of March 2024, a reduction from US$939.6m over a year. On the flip side, it has US$153.7m in cash leading to net debt of about US$554.3m.

下面的图片(点击可放大)显示,MasterBrand在2024年3月底的债务为7.08亿美元,比一年前的9.396亿美元减少。另一方面,它有1.537亿美元的现金,导致净债务约为5.543亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:MBC Debt to Equity History May 29th 2024
NYSE:MBC 债务/股本历史数据 2024年5月29日

A Look At MasterBrand's Liabilities

MasterBrand的负债情况

The latest balance sheet data shows that MasterBrand had liabilities of US$340.4m due within a year, and liabilities of US$830.7m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$153.7m and US$224.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$793.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,MasterBrand的负债中有3.404亿美元在一年内到期,830.7 million美元的负债在此后到期。另一方面,它在一年内有1.537亿美元的现金和2.244亿美元的应收账款。因此,其负债比其现金和短期应收账款的组合多了7.93亿美元。

MasterBrand has a market capitalization of US$2.06b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

MasterBrand 的市值为20.6亿美元,所以如果需要,它很可能筹集资金来改善其资产负债表。但是很明显,我们应该仔细审查它是否能够在不稀释股东的情况下管理其债务。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了衡量公司债务相对于其收益的大小,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)以及其税前收益与利息支出(其利息覆盖率)的比率。这样,我们既考虑了债务的绝对量,也考虑了所支付的利率。

MasterBrand has net debt worth 1.5 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 4.9 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. We saw MasterBrand grow its EBIT by 2.4% in the last twelve months. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if MasterBrand can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

MasterBrand 的净债务值为EBITDA的1.5倍,不算太多,但是其利息覆盖倍数看起来有点低,EBIT只有利息费用的4.9倍。虽然这些数字不会使我们惊慌,但值得注意的是,公司的债务成本正在产生实际影响。我们看到MasterBrand在过去12个月中将EBIT增长了2.4%。虽然这不能让我们感到十分兴奋,但在处理债务方面却是一个好兆头。在债务方面,我们最多从资产负债表中学到。但是,最终业务的未来利润能力将决定MasterBrand是否能够长期加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您专注于未来,请查看此免费报告,以了解分析师的利润预测。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, MasterBrand produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 73% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最后,公司只能用真正的现金而不是会计利润来偿还债务。因此,我们需要清楚地看到EBIT是否导致相应的自由现金流。在过去三年中,MasterBrand产生了稳健的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的73%,与我们的预期大致相当。这笔真正的现金意味着它可以在希望的时候减少债务。

Our View

我们的观点

On our analysis MasterBrand's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit to handle its total liabilities. Considering this range of data points, we think MasterBrand is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for MasterBrand you should be aware of.

根据我们的分析,MasterBrand的EBIT转化为自由现金流应该表明其应对债务不会遇到太大的困难。但我们上面提到的其他因素并不令人鼓舞。例如,似乎它必须努力应对其总负债。综合考虑这些数据点,我们认为MasterBrand有能力管理其债务水平。但是需要注意的是:我们认为债务水平已经高到需要持续监测的程度。同时,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范围的风险。例如我们已经发现了1个MasterBrand的警告信号,您应该知道。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发