share_log

MYS Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002303) Top Holders Are Insiders and They Are Likely Disappointed by the Recent 14% Drop

MYS Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002303) Top Holders Are Insiders and They Are Likely Disappointed by the Recent 14% Drop

MYS 集团有限公司's (SZSE: 002303) 头号持有者是内部人士,他们可能对最近14%的跌幅感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  05/29 19:01

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over MYS Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 2 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 对MYS集团的重大内部控制意味着公司增长的既得利益
  • 前两名股东拥有公司 50% 的股份
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

If you want to know who really controls MYS Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002303), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 52% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了MYS集团有限公司(SZSE:002303),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。个人内部人士持有52%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥689m.

结果,在市值下降68900万元人民币之后,内部人士整体遭受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MYS Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于MYS集团的什么。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002303 Ownership Breakdown May 29th 2024
SZSE: 002303 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MYS Group?

关于MYS集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

MYS Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MYS Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

MYS集团已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到MYS集团的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002303 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 29th 2024
SZSE: 002303 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 29 日

MYS Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Haipeng Wang with 41% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.9% and 1.6% of the stock. Zhijun Wang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

MYS集团不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是王海鹏,已发行股份的41%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.9%和1.6%的股份。第二大股东王志军也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of MYS Group

MYS 集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of MYS Group Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.3b, that means they have CN¥2.3b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有MYS集团有限公司一半以上的股份。这使他们能够有效控制公司。鉴于其市值为43元人民币,这意味着他们拥有价值23元人民币的股票。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 43% stake in MYS Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有MYS集团43%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with MYS Group (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该了解我们在MYS集团发现的2个警告信号(其中一个有点令人担忧)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发