share_log

Is AAR (NYSE:AIR) A Risky Investment?

Is AAR (NYSE:AIR) A Risky Investment?

AAR(纽约证券交易所代码:AIR)是一项风险投资吗?
Simply Wall St ·  05/30 07:58

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that AAR Corp. (NYSE:AIR) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

大卫·伊本说得好,他说:“波动性不是我们关心的风险。我们关心的是避免资本的永久损失。”当你检查公司的资产负债表的风险时,考虑它的资产负债表是很自然的,因为企业倒闭时通常会涉及债务。我们注意到,AAR公司(纽约证券交易所代码:AIR)的资产负债表上确实有债务。但真正的问题是这笔债务是否使公司面临风险。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

债务会带来什么风险?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

一般而言,只有当公司无法通过筹集资金或用自己的现金流轻松还清债务时,债务才会成为真正的问题。在最坏的情况下,如果公司无法向债权人付款,它可能会破产。但是,更频繁(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东,以支撑其资产负债表。当然,债务可以成为企业的重要工具,尤其是资本密集型企业。考虑公司的债务水平的第一步是同时考虑其现金和债务。

What Is AAR's Net Debt?

AAR 的净负债是多少?

As you can see below, at the end of February 2024, AAR had US$274.7m of debt, up from US$185.6m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$69.2m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$205.5m.

如下所示,截至2024年2月底,AAR的债务为2.747亿美元,高于去年同期的1.856亿美元。点击图片查看更多细节。但是,它确实有6,920万美元的现金抵消了这一点,净负债约为2.055亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:AIR Debt to Equity History May 30th 2024
纽约证券交易所:航空债务与股本比率历史记录 2024 年 5 月 30 日

A Look At AAR's Liabilities

看看 AAR 的负债

The latest balance sheet data shows that AAR had liabilities of US$428.2m due within a year, and liabilities of US$425.6m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$69.2m in cash and US$343.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$441.0m.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,AAR的负债为4.282亿美元,之后到期的负债为4.256亿美元。与此相抵消的是,它有6,920万美元的现金和3.436亿美元的应收账款将在12个月内到期。因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款总额4.41亿美元。

Of course, AAR has a market capitalization of US$2.47b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

当然,AAR的市值为24.7亿美元,因此这些负债可能是可以控制的。但是,有足够的负债,我们肯定会建议股东今后继续监督资产负债表。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们使用两个主要比率来告知我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),第二个是其利息和税前收益(EBIT)覆盖其利息支出(或简称利息保障)的多少倍。这样,我们既考虑债务的绝对数量,也考虑为债务支付的利率。

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.1 and interest cover of 5.9 times, it seems to us that AAR is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. One way AAR could vanquish its debt would be if it stops borrowing more but continues to grow EBIT at around 18%, as it did over the last year. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine AAR's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

从其净负债占息税折旧摊销前利润的1.1倍和利息覆盖率的5.9倍来看,在我们看来,AAR可能正在以相当合理的方式使用债务。但是,利息支付肯定足以让我们考虑其债务的负担能力。AAR克服债务的一种方法是停止增加借款,但继续像去年一样将息税前利润增长至18%左右。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但是,未来的收益比什么都更能决定AAR未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, AAR created free cash flow amounting to 17% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润根本无法减少债务。因此,我们总是检查息税前利润中有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去的三年中,AAR创造了相当于其息税前利润的17%的自由现金流,表现平淡无奇。这种低迷的现金转换水平削弱了其管理和偿还债务的能力。

Our View

我们的观点

AAR's EBIT growth rate was a real positive on this analysis, as was its net debt to EBITDA. Having said that, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow somewhat sensitizes us to potential future risks to the balance sheet. Considering this range of data points, we think AAR is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for AAR you should know about.

根据这项分析,AAR的息税前利润增长率确实是积极的,其净负债占息税折旧摊销前利润的比例也是如此。话虽如此,它将息税前利润转换为自由现金流在一定程度上使我们对资产负债表未来的潜在风险保持敏感。考虑到这一范围内的数据点,我们认为AAR完全有能力管理其债务水平。但要谨慎一点:我们认为债务水平足够高,足以证明持续监测是合理的。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但是,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中,远非如此。这些风险可能很难发现。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了你应该知道的4个AAR警告信号。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

毕竟,如果你对一家资产负债表坚如磐石的快速成长型公司更感兴趣,那么请立即查看我们的净现金增长股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发