BOC International (China) CO., LTD. (SHSE:601696) Stock Most Popular Amongst Public Companies Who Own 41%, While Individual Investors Hold 32%
BOC International (China) CO., LTD. (SHSE:601696) Stock Most Popular Amongst Public Companies Who Own 41%, While Individual Investors Hold 32%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over BOC International (China) by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 公众公司对中银证券(中国)的重要控制意味着,普通公众有更多的权力来影响管理和治理相关决策。
- 共有3位投资者占公司的多数股权,拥有52%的所有权。
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
Every investor in BOC International (China) CO., LTD. (SHSE:601696) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 41% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
中银证券(中国)有限责任公司 (SHSE:601696)的每一位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。拥有41%股份的上市公司持有该公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最多(或者如果发生经济衰退,则失去最多)。
Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 32% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,个人投资者占公司股东的32%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of BOC International (China).
如下图所示,我们放大了中银证券(中国)的不同所有权集团。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240531/0-456ab6b54b1a564386892ce98c7d402e-0-301aed9efc23d548906eb6337ce6109f.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BOC International (China)?
机构持股对中银证券(中国)有什么影响?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in BOC International (China). This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of BOC International (China), (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所见,机构投资者在中银证券(中国)中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者所谓的认可,因为他们也有时会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售一个股票,很常见看到股价暴跌。因此,值得检查中银证券(中国)的过去盈利轨迹(下方)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240531/0-456ab6b54b1a564386892ce98c7d402e-1-89928eb1299a8505794785a8c2bba40f.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in BOC International (China). Bank of China Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 14% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
对于中银证券(中国)来说,对冲基金所持股份较少。中国银行股份有限公司目前是该公司最大的股东,持有33%的流通股。为了让您了解,第二大股东持有流通股约14%,第三大股东持有流通股的股权比例为4.7%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of BOC International (China)
中银证券(中国)的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我们的数据无法确认董事会成员是否持有个人股份。董事会成员至少持有一些个人股份是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行动是检查CEO的薪资。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
考虑到不同的股东群体对一家公司的股份持有情况,总是值得去思考。但是,为了更好地了解韵达股份,我们需要考虑其他许多因素。事实证明:我们发现了韵达股份的1个警示信号,您需要意识到该信号。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 19%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示私人公司持有该公司19%的股份。光凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得了解谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过一个单独的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
It appears to us that public companies own 41% of BOC International (China). We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
按照我们的观察,公共公司拥有中银证券(中国)的41%。我们不能确定,但这很可能是一项战略股权。这些企业可以类似或相互协作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢检查营收增长的历史记录。您也可以通过查看这个详细的图表中历史营收和收益的免费图表来了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。