Private Companies in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603931) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 9.2% Last Week
Private Companies in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603931) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 9.2% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 2 shareholders own 63% of the company
- 12% of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials is held by Institutions
- 私人公司对杭州格林达电子材料的重大控制意味着普通公众有更大的权力影响管理和治理有关的决策。
- 前2大股东拥有公司的63%。
- 12%的杭州格林达电子材料由机构持有。
If you want to know who really controls Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603931), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 51% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制杭州格林达电子材料股份有限公司(SHSE:603931),那么你就得看看其股份登记簿的构成。私人公司持有51%的股份,是该公司最大的股东,这意味着如果股票上涨(或下跌),该集团将获得最大的利益(或损失最大的利益)。
As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥4.8b market cap following a 9.2% gain in the stock.
因此,随着公司股价上涨9.2%,私人公司在上周共计获得最高分,市值达到48亿元。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究杭州格林达电子材料的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials?
机构投资者对杭州格林达电子材料有什么影响?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在杭州格林达电子材料中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要过分相信机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变他们对股票的看法,您可能会看到股价快速下降。因此,值得在下面看看杭州格林达电子材料的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Hangzhou Electrochemical Group Co., Ltd. with 42% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 21% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对杭州格林达电子材料而言,对冲基金持有的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,持有占流通股的42%的股权最大的股东是杭州电化集团有限公司。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的21%和5.9%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但还是研究分析师的建议,以深入了解股票预期表现,是一个好习惯。就我们所知,该公司没有分析师覆盖,因此可能没有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials
杭州格林达电子材料的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.8b, and the board has only CN¥18m worth of shares in their own names. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人员拥有杭州格林达电子材料股份有限公司的不到1%的股份。但是,他们可能通过我们没有发现的企业结构间接参与。它的市值只有4.8亿元,董事会自己名下的股份只有1800万元。许多投资于小型公司的投资者更喜欢看到董事会更加投资。您可以点击此处查看这些内部人士是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有杭州格林达电子材料的16%的股份。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 21%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
拥有21%的股份的私人股权公司有能力在价值创造方面起到引领作用。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓舞,因为私人股权有时能够鼓励有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些股东可能在将其公开后退出投资。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 51%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们可以看到私人公司拥有已发布股份的51%的所有权。私人公司可能是关联方。有时内部人员通过私人公司持有公共公司的利益,而不是作为个人。虽然很难作出任何笼统的结论,但值得注意的是对进一步研究的区域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
始终考虑持有公司股份的不同群体是值得的。但是要更好地了解杭州格林达电子材料,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例——杭州格林达电子材料有1个警告信号,我们认为您应该知道。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更愿意查看另一家具有潜在更强财务状况的公司,请不要错过这份由强大财务数据支撑的有趣公司的免费列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。