share_log

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd.'s (SZSE:300354) Market Cap Rises to CN¥5.5b

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd.'s (SZSE:300354) Market Cap Rises to CN¥5.5b

内部人士是主要受益者,因为东华测试技术有限公司s (SZSE: 300354) 市值升至55亿元人民币
Simply Wall St ·  05/31 19:13

Key Insights

主要见解

  • DongHua Testing Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 57% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutions own 23% of DongHua Testing Technology
  • 东华测试技术的重要内部股权表明公司扩张的内在利益
  • 前2名股东持有57%的业务
  • 机构拥有东华测试技术的23%

Every investor in DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd. (SZSE:300354) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 55% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

SZSE:300354的每个投资者都应该意识到最强劲的股东群体。个人内部人拥有公司的最大股份,占55%的股份。换句话说,该集团从投资公司中获得(或损失)的利润最多。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 9.2% gain.

因此,内部人成为上周9.2%涨幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DongHua Testing Technology, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨东华测试技术的各种所有者类型,从以下的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300354 Ownership Breakdown May 31st 2024
SZSE:300354所有权构成 2024年5月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DongHua Testing Technology?

机构所有权告诉我们东华测试技术的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

DongHua Testing Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DongHua Testing Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

东华测试技术已经有机构在股东名册上了。他们确实拥有相当大的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉度。但是,最好小心依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图出售股票,股价下跌也是很常见的。因此,最好检查东华测试技术的过去盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300354 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 31st 2024
SZSE:300354收入和营收增长2024年5月31日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DongHua Testing Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shigang Liu with 49% of shares outstanding. Bank of Communications Schroder Fund Management Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.1% of common stock, and Mian Luo holds about 5.0% of the company stock.

我们注意到,对于东华测试技术,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是刘实刚,持有49%的流通股。通联基金管理有限责任公司是第二大股东,拥有普通股的8.1%,罗缅持有公司股票的约5.0%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of DongHua Testing Technology

东华测试技术的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥3.1b worth of shares in the CN¥5.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

似乎内部人拥有东华测试技术股票的一半以上。这赋予了他们很大的权力。这意味着他们拥有CN¥31亿的CN¥55亿公司股票。这非常重要。大多数人会认为这是一个积极的迹象,表明与股东的强烈的一致性。单击此处以查看内部人是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in DongHua Testing Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是个人投资者的公众持有DongHua Testing Technology的22%的股权。尽管这种所有权的大小可能不足以在其支持中产生政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for DongHua Testing Technology you should know about.

我认为查看一个公司的所有者是非常有趣的。但是,为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。考虑一下风险,例如。每个公司都面临这些风险,我们已经发现了DongHua Testing Technology的1个警示标志,您应该知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发