Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300530) Last Week's 21% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300530) Last Week's 21% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 67% ownership
- Insider ownership in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group is 35%
- 湖南领湃科技集团的私营公司所持有的大量股权表明,它们共同在管理和业务策略方面具有更大的发言权。
- 共有2名投资者拥有该公司的67%所有权。
- 领湃科技的内部持股比例为35%。
A look at the shareholders of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300530) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 40% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
观察湖南领湃科技集团股份有限公司(SZSE:300530)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最为强大。持有最多股权的是持股40%的私营公司群体。换句话说,该群体将从其对公司的投资中获得最大的收益(或承受最大的风险)。
While insiders, who own 35% shares weren't spared from last week's CN¥789m market cap drop, private companies as a group suffered the maximum losses
上周CN¥7.89亿市值下跌,内部持有35%股份的股东并未幸免,而私营公司群体则遭受最大的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究湖南领湃科技集团的每一类股东,首先从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hunan Lead Power Technology Group?
机构所有权告诉我们有关湖南领湃科技集团的哪些信息? 持有湖南领湃科技集团不到5%的是机构投资者。这表明一些基金关注该公司,但许多基金尚未购买其股票。如果该企业从此变得更加强劲,我们可能会看到更多机构渴望购买该股票的情况。有时候,当几个大型机构想要同时购买某个股票时,我们会看到股价上涨。下面你可以看到收益和营业收入的历史,这可能有助于考虑更多机构投资者是否想要购买该股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Less than 5% of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
SZSE:300530收入和收益增长2024年6月5日
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group. Our data shows that Hengyan Hongqi Investment Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. Zhihua Cai is the second largest shareholder owning 31% of common stock, and Vered Holdings Co., Ltd. holds about 4.6% of the company stock.
湖南领湃科技集团内部持股 看起来内部人持有湖南领湃科技集团股份相当比例。市值仅为CN¥2.9亿,内部人自己名下的股份价值为1亿。看到内部人在企业中有如此大的投资非常棒。值得注意的是,如果内部人没有最近购买股票,那么检查一下是否有可能。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
尽管我们需要研究一个公司的机构所有权数据是有道理的,但也需要研究分析师的情绪来了解市场趋势。我们目前没有发现任何关于该股票的分析师报道,所以该公司可能不受广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group
普通公众个体投资者持有湖南领湃科技集团21%的股份。尽管股份比例相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.9b, and insiders have CN¥1.0b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来私营公司群体拥有湖南领湃科技集团股票的40%。仅从这一事实中很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究所有拥有这些私人公司的人。有时,内部人或其他相关人士通过另一个单独的私人公司持有上市公司的股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
查看公司所有者确实很有趣。但是,为了真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了湖南领湃科技集团的2个警示信号,您应该注意一下。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 40%, of the Hunan Lead Power Technology Group stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
看起来,私人公司持有湖南领湃科技集团40%的股票。仅凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究一下私人公司的所有者是谁。有时内部人员或其他相关方会通过单独的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Hunan Lead Power Technology Group that you should be aware of.
查看公司所有者确实很有趣。但是,为了真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了湖南领湃科技集团的2个警示信号,您应该注意一下。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。