share_log

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

RLI保险(纽交所:RLI)持有80%的股份,强烈受机构投资者控制。
Simply Wall St ·  06/04 06:38

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies RLI's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

  • 高机构所有权意味着RLI的股价对其交易行为很敏感

  • 共有13名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%

  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry.  The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions.   That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了RLI公司(纽约证券交易所代码:RLI),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为80%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors.  Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.  

由于机构可以获得大量资本,因此其市场走势往往会受到散户或个人投资者的严格审查。因此,将大量机构资金投资于公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RLI.

在下图中,我们放大了RLI的不同所有权组。

NYSE:RLI Ownership Breakdown June 4th 2024

纽约证券交易所:RLI 所有权明细 2024 年 6 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RLI?

关于RLI,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that RLI does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock.  This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does.  When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RLI's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,RLI确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到RLI的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多内容。

NYSE:RLI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 4th 2024

纽约证券交易所:RLI 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 4 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences.    RLI is not owned by hedge funds.      The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.9% of shares outstanding.        Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.6% and 7.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.  

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。RLI 不归对冲基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为9.9%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的9.6%和7.8%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.  

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现前13名股东拥有该公司的总所有权为51%,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance.   Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.  

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为你的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种很好的做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of RLI

RLI 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count.  Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in RLI Corp..   The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$255m. Most would see this as a real positive.  It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.  

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有RLI Corp的股份。内部人士持有价值2.55亿美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RLI.   While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有RLI16%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.    To that end, you should learn about the   2 warning signs we've spotted with RLI (including 1 which is concerning) .  

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该了解我们在RLI中发现的2个警告信号(包括一个令人担忧的信号)。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发