share_log

CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

纳斯达克上的CSX公司受到持有公司75%股权的机构投资者的青睐。
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 07:12

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CSX's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构持股比例高意味着CSX的股票价格受到他们交易行为的影响。
  • 共有25家投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,达到49%的持股比例。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

If you want to know who really controls CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着CSX公司(NASDAQ:CSX),那么你得看看它的股份登记簿构成。我们可以看到机构持有这家公司的绝大部分股份,持股比例为75%。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获得最大收益(或者如果股票出现了一次下跌,该群体将遭受最大损失)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CSX.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了CSX的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CSX Ownership Breakdown June 6th 2024
纳斯达克CSX所有权分布图(2024年6月6日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CSX?

机构持股告诉我们关于CSX的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

CSX already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CSX, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

CSX的股份登记簿已经有了机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当大的股份。这表明一些专业投资者对该公司有信誉。但不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果有两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一支股票,通常会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查一下CSX的过去收入轨迹(如下图)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CSX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 6th 2024
纳斯达克CSX收入和营业收入增长图(2024年6月6日)

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. CSX is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 4.9% of the stock.

由于机构投资者持有超过一半的发行股份,董事会可能会注意他们的喜好。CSX不是由对冲基金所有。先锋集团是目前最大的股东,持有9.0%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约7.2%和4.9%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of CSX

CSX的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that CSX Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$98m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息表明,CSX的内部人员拥有不到1%的公司股份。由于规模如此之大,我们不希望内部人员拥有大量的股票。总的来说,他们拥有9800万美元的股票。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但最好检查一下这些内部人员是否一直在购买股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in CSX. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般大众(通常是个人投资者)持有CSX的25%的股份。虽然这一持股比例相当可观,但如果公司决策与其他大股东不一致,可能还不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for CSX you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如:我们已经发现CSX的一个警告迹象,你需要注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发