share_log

Institutional Investors in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL) Lost 3.0% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL) Lost 3.0% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

上周纽交所公司SFL Corporation Ltd.(NYSE:SFL)的机构投资者亏损了3.0%,但已经收获了更长期的创业板。
Simply Wall St ·  06/07 09:38

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies SFL's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构所有权显著高表明SFL的股价对他们的交易行动非常敏感。
  • 前十大股东拥有该公司的50%。
  • 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

为了了解谁真正控制着SFL公司(NYSE:SFL),了解公司的所有权结构是很重要的。机构拥有该公司的42%股份。换句话说,集团从他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或最少)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.0% in value last week. Still, the 64% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

没有股东喜欢在他们的投资中亏损,特别是看到他们持有的股票上周跌了3.0%的机构投资者。尽管如此,在过去一年中64%的涨幅或许有助于减轻他们的整体亏损,但他们可能仍会对未来的亏损感到谨慎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of SFL.

下面的图表显示了SFL公司不同的所有权集团。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SFL Ownership Breakdown June 7th 2024
NYSE:SFL所有权结构2024年6月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SFL?

机构所有权告诉我们SFL有什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

SFL already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at SFL's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

SFL的股份登记簿上已经有机构了。他们拥有公司的一部分股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经研究过这只股票,并喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果多个机构同时改变对某股票的看法,股价会迅速下跌。因此,查看下面SFL的收益历史也是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SFL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 7th 2024
NYSE:SFL收益和营业收入增长2024年6月7日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in SFL. Our data shows that Greenwich Holdings Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. DNB Asset Management AS is the second largest shareholder owning 9.3% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 7.1% of the company stock.

对SFL而言,对冲基金没有太多的股份。根据我们的数据,Greenwich Holdings Ltd.是最大的股东,持有20%的流通股。DNB Asset Management AS是第二大股东,拥有公司普通股的9.3%,而Dimensional Fund Advisors LP则持有公司7.1%的股份。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前10大股东持有超过半数股份,有一些较小的股东以一定程度上平衡更大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of SFL

SFL的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of SFL Corporation Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$2.0m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最近的数据显示内部人员拥有SFL公司的不到1%的股份。但他们可能通过我们没有发现的公司结构间接拥有利益。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人员拥有价值200万美元的股份。绝对价值可能比所占比例更重要。看到董事会成员拥有股份是一个好的信号,但检查这些内部人员是否一直在买入股票也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众--包括零售投资者--拥有公司的37%股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管该所有权比例相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不相符,它可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 20%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到私人公司拥有该公司20%的股份。这可能值得更深入地研究。如果相关方,如内部人员,对这些私人公司的任意一个有利益,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for SFL (of which 2 are a bit concerning!) you should know about.

虽然考虑到公司所有权的不同集团是值得的,但还有更重要的因素,例如风险。每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现SFL有3个警告信号(其中2个令人有点担忧!)你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发