share_log

Sipai Health Technology Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:314) Last Week's 8.8% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

Sipai Health Technology Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:314) Last Week's 8.8% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

上周国股健康科技有限公司(HKG:314)的股价下跌了8.8%,一定让持有大量股份的散户投资者感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  06/07 19:25

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Sipai Health Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 零售投资者对思派健康技术的显着控制意味着普通公众有更多的权力影响管理和治理相关决策。
  • 五大股东占了该公司53%的股权。
  • 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。

If you want to know who really controls Sipai Health Technology Co., Ltd. (HKG:314), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 40% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制思派健康技术股份有限公司(港交所:314),那么你需要看看它的股权登记。零售投资者拥有公司中最多的股份,占有40%的股权。换句话说,该集团从其对公司的投资中获得(或失去)最多的利益。在上周股价下跌了8.8%之后,零售投资者遭受了最大的损失。

And following last week's 8.8% decline in share price, retail investors suffered the most losses.

上周股价下跌8.8%,对零售投资者造成了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sipai Health Technology.

在下图中,我们放大了思派健康技术不同所有权集团的情况。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:314 Ownership Breakdown June 7th 2024
2024年6月7日香港联合交易所考虑所有权的分布。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sipai Health Technology?

机构投资者对思派健康技术有一定的股权。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看了这支股票,他们喜欢它。但是和其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一支股票,那么很容易看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查思派健康技术的过去盈利轨迹(见下文)。当然,还有其他因素需要考虑。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Sipai Health Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sipai Health Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所见,机构投资者在思派健康技术中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看了这支股票,他们喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一支股票,那么很容易看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查思派健康技术的过去盈利轨迹(见下文)。当然,还有其他因素需要考虑,太。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:314 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 7th 2024
思派健康技术的收益和营业收入增长(见下图)。

Sipai Health Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Tencent Holdings Limited with 27% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Fidelity International Ltd and Xuguang Ma, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.5%. Xuguang Ma, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

腾讯控股有限公司是思派健康技术的最大股东,持有27%的流通股。第二和第三大股东是富达国际有限公司和马旭光先生,他们各持有7.5%的股份。同时,马旭光先生还拥有董事长的头衔。

On looking further, we found that 53% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察,思派健康技术的前五大股东持有53%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中拥有重要的发言权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Sipai Health Technology

思派健康技术内部股东持股情况。作为个人,内部股东的共同持股价值为4.4亿港币。这至少表明了一定程度的关联。点击此处查看股东的买卖情况。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Sipai Health Technology Co., Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own HK$329m worth of the HK$4.4b company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

拥有40%的股份,以个人投资者的大众为主,对思派健康技术有一定的影响力。但这种所有权的规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能无法改变公司政策。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sipai Health Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

私募股权公司持有思派健康技术11%的股份。这意味着它们可以在重要的政策决策上发挥影响力。有时我们会看到私募股权公司长期持股,但通常情况下,它们的投资周期较短,而且不会在公共公司投资太多。过段时间后,它们可能会考虑出售并重新投资别处的资本。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 11% stake in Sipai Health Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私营企业拥有思派健康技术5.2%的股份。私有企业可能是有关方。有时内部人士通过在私有企业中持有持股来参与公共公司。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但这是值得进一步研究的领域。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 5.2%, of the Sipai Health Technology stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

上市公司当前持有思派健康技术27%的股份。我们无法确定,但很可能这是一个战略性的股份。这些企业可能相似或相互合作。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 27% of Sipai Health Technology stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问此交互式图表以了解过去的收益,营业收入和现金流。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发