Individual Investors Who Hold 36% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Gained 3.4%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 36% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Gained 3.4%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in iFAST indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 4 shareholders own 55% of the company
- Insiders have bought recently
- 奕丰的许多个体投资者持有大部分股份,这意味着他们在公司管理和业务策略中拥有更大的话语权。
- 前 4 大股东拥有公司的 55% 股份。
- 内部人士最近购买了股票。
A look at the shareholders of iFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 36% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
了解奕丰集团股份有限公司(SGX:AIY)的股东可以告诉我们哪个团体最有权力。在公司中持有最多股份的是个体投资者,占公司股份的约 36%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该团体将受益最多(或如果有下跌,则损失最大)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 3.4% price gain, insiders also received a 29% cut.
虽然在上周的 3.4% 的股票涨幅中,个体投资者是赚取最多的团体,但内部人员也获得了 29% 的股票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of iFAST, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨奕丰集团的每种股东类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iFAST?
机构投资者对奕丰集团的投资指示了该公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变他们的股票观点,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,查看奕丰集团的收益历史非常重要。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
iFAST already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see iFAST's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
奕丰集团已经有机构持股,事实上,它们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过该股票并且认为它很好。但就像其他任何人一样,他们可能是错误的。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在着他们对某种“拥挤”的交易的风险。当这种交易出错时,多个方面可能会竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在一家没有成长历史的公司中更高。您可以在以下看到奕丰的历史收益和营业收入情况,但请记住,这只是故事的一部分。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in iFAST. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chung Chun Lim with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 12% of the stock.
对于奕丰集团而言,对冲基金并没有太多股票。通过查看我们的数据,我们可以看到,最大的股东是 CEO 郑俊霖,持有公司已发行股份的 19%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东的持股比例约为 17% 和 12%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前四名股东控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着该集团对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of iFAST
普通大众,包括散户投资者,拥有公司的36%股份,因此不能轻松忽略。虽然这样的所有权规模可能不足以左右他们的政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of iFAST Corporation Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just S$2.1b, and insiders have S$598m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最新的数据表明,奕丰集团的内部人员拥有相当比例的股份。它的市值只有 21 亿新元,并且内部人员拥有自己名下价值 5.98 亿新元的股票。这相当可观。通过这里可以查看他们最近是否一直在购买股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over iFAST. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有 36% 的持股比例的个人投资者属于大众,他们对奕丰集团仍然有一定影响力。尽管拥有这样比例的股份可能不足以影响他们的政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the iFAST stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司拥有 iFAST 的 13% 股权。单从这个事实中很难得出任何结论,所以值得进一步研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时候,内部人员或其他相关方通过一个独立的私人公司拥有对公开公司的股份兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand iFAST better, we need to consider many other factors.
总是值得考虑持有公司股份的不同团体。但要更好地了解奕丰集团,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问此交互式图表以了解过去的收益,营业收入和现金流。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。