share_log

NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) Insiders, Who Hold 58% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) Insiders, Who Hold 58% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

南京证券GOVA科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688539)的内部持有人持股58%的公司可能会对最近的回调感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  06/07 21:13

Key Insights

主要见解

  • NanJing GOVA Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 55% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in NanJing GOVA Technology is 15%
  • 南京GOVA Technology显著的内部所有权表明公司扩张中存在内在利益。
  • 前4大股东持有55%的业务。
  • 南京GOVA Technology的机构持股比例为15%。

A look at the shareholders of NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看南京GOVA Technology Co.,Ltd.(SHSE:688539)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。我们可以看到个人内部持有公司58%的所有权。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As market cap fell to CN¥5.6b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着市值上周跌至56亿元人民币,内部人士将面临公司股东中最高的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about NanJing GOVA Technology.

让我们更仔细地观察不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关南京GOVA Technology的什么信息。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688539 Ownership Breakdown June 8th 2024
SHSE:688539所有权分类 2024年6月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NanJing GOVA Technology?

机构持股告诉我们有关南京GOVA Technology的什么信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

NanJing GOVA Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at NanJing GOVA Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

南京GOVA Technology已经有机构在股份登记簿上了。实际上,他们拥有公司的可观股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经查看了该股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们可能是错的。如果多个机构同时改变他们对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价快速下降。因此,值得仔细查看下面南京GOVA Technology的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688539 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 8th 2024
SHSE:688539盈利和营业收入增长情况 2024年6月8日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in NanJing GOVA Technology. Weiping Li is currently the company's largest shareholder with 18% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 12%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Biao Huang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我们注意到,对于南京GOVA Technology,对冲基金没有意义的投资。魏平李目前是该公司最大的股东,持有流通股的18%。与此同时,第二和第三大的股东分别持有流通股的14%和12%。第三大股东应回旋,也是董事会成员。

On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步查看,我们发现前4大股东拥有该公司55%的股份。换言之,这些股东对公司的决策有着重要的影响。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of NanJing GOVA Technology

南京GOVA Technology内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a CN¥3.3b stake in this CN¥5.6b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据显示内部人员拥有南京GOVA Technology Co.,Ltd.的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以为公司作出共同决策。因此,他们在这家价值56亿元人民币的公司中占有33亿元人民币的股份。大多数人都会很高兴看到,董事会正在与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否一直在购买或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NanJing GOVA Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

占股25%的普通公众股东,主要由个人投资者组成,对南京GOVA Technology具有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能够决定公司的命运,但它确实可以对公司的经营产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NanJing GOVA Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for NanJing GOVA Technology (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about.

总是值得考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体。但要更好地了解南京GOVA Technology,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现南京GOVA Technology的2个警示标志(其中1个有些令人担忧!)

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发