share_log

WaFd, Inc's (NASDAQ:WAFD) Recent 3.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

WaFd, Inc's (NASDAQ:WAFD) Recent 3.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

纳斯达克上的WAFD公司最近下跌了3.7%,导致一年的亏损加剧,机构投资者可能会采取果断措施。
Simply Wall St ·  06/08 08:45

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in WaFd implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构大量持有WaFd的股份,意味着他们对公司的股价有重要的影响力。
  • 前13大股东持有公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of WaFd, Inc (NASDAQ:WAFD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了WaFd,Inc(NASDAQ:WAFD),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有最大股份的是拥有71%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大的收益(如果出现下行情况,将面临最大的损失)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 3.7% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 3.9% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell WaFd, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

机构投资者在公司股价上周下跌3.7%之后承受了最大的损失。这次最近的损失增加了股东一年的3.9%的损失,可能不符合这群投资者的心意。机构也称为“聪明的钱”,他们可以对股票价格的走势有很大的影响。因此,如果下跌趋势继续下去,机构可能会面临出售WaFd的压力,这可能会对个人投资者产生负面影响。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of WaFd, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探究WaFd的每种业主类型,首先从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:WAFD Ownership Breakdown June 8th 2024
纳斯达克:WAFD所有权结构于2024年6月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WaFd?

机构持股信息告诉我们关于WaFd什么?WaFd已经有机构投资者持有股权。他们拥有公司的尊重股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了该股票,他们也喜欢它。但是,和其他任何人一样,他们可能是错误的。如果多个机构同时改变对股票的看法,股价可能会快速下降。因此,值得关注WaFd以下的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

WaFd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at WaFd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

WaFd已经有机构投资者持有股权。他们拥有公司的尊重股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了该股票,他们也喜欢它。但是,和其他任何人一样,他们可能是错误的。如果多个机构同时改变对股票的看法,股价可能会快速下降。因此,值得关注WaFd以下的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:WAFD Earnings and Revenue Growth June 8th 2024
纳斯达克:WAFD的收益和营业收入增长于2024年6月8日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. WaFd is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 13%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

由于机构投资者拥有发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能会注意到他们的偏好。WaFd不被对冲基金持有。公司的最大股东是BlackRock,Inc.,持股13%。为了说明,第二大股东持有约9.7%的流通股,第三大股东持有6.9%的流通股。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

通过查看股东登记表,我们可以看到前13大股东控制了50%的所有权,这意味着没有单个股东拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

尽管有道理去研究一家公司的机构所有权数据,但了解分析师的观点也很有道理,以便知道市场的风向。由于相当多的分析师涵盖了该股票,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of WaFd

WaFd的内部股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计入内部人员。管理层最终向董事会回答。然而,经理往往会成为执行董事会成员,尤其是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in WaFd, Inc. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$30m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明内部持有WaFd,Inc.的股份。它是一家相当大的公司,所以看到一些可能意义重大的对齐是非常积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约3000万美元的股票。看到内部人员投资的水平是好的。您可以在此处检查是否最近有内部人员购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in WaFd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众拥有WaFd 28%的持股,虽然相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand WaFd better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for WaFd that you should be aware of.

在考虑公司的股权的不同群体时,总是值得思考的。但是为了更好地了解WaFd,我们需要考虑其他许多因素。例如,我们已经确定了WaFd的两个警告信号,您应该注意这一点。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发