Recent 17% Pullback Would Hurt G.Tech Technology Ltd. (SZSE:301503) Insiders
Recent 17% Pullback Would Hurt G.Tech Technology Ltd. (SZSE:301503) Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in G.Tech Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 59% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 内部人士似乎对G.Tech Technology的增长有着浓厚的兴趣,如其巨大的所有权所示。
- 前两大股东持有业务的59%。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
Every investor in G.Tech Technology Ltd. (SZSE:301503) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
G.Tech Technology Ltd.(SZSE:301503)的每位投资者都应该了解最强势的股东群体。我们可以看到,个人内部人士拥有该公司的巨大股权,占有59%的所有权,也就是说,如果股票涨了,这个群体将获益最多(或者如果出现了经济衰退就会失去最多)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 17%.
上周,随着股票下跌17%,内部持有人遭受了最大的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of G.Tech Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨G.Tech Technology每种类型的所有者,从下面的图表开始。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240610/0-bafdd09def43c7f63916f912389020f3-0-7d4a85e4272b5a90e01e97f261a9bb50.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About G.Tech Technology?
机构持股对G.Tech Technology意味着什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that G.Tech Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of G.Tech Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,G.Tech Technology确实拥有机构投资者,并且它们持有公司的大部分股票。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过该股票,并且他们喜欢它。但与任何其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图出售某支股票,往往会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得查看G.Tech Technology的过去盈利轨迹(如下图)。当然,还要记住考虑其他因素。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240610/0-bafdd09def43c7f63916f912389020f3-1-526d8b55715eed497a0e385ee5bb3e25.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in G.Tech Technology. Our data shows that Weiming Xie is the largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 29% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.6% by the third-largest shareholder.
我们注意到对于G.Tech Technology,对冲基金没有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,谢伟明是最大的股东,拥有30%的已发行股票。为了提供背景,第二大股东持有大约29%的已发行股票,第三大股东拥有6.6%的所有权。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 59% stake.
股东登记簿的更详细研究表明,两个最大的股东拥有公司的59%股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但还是研究分析师的建议,以深入了解股票预期表现,是一个好习惯。就我们所知,该公司没有分析师覆盖,因此可能没有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of G.Tech Technology
G.Tech Technology的内部人士所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of G.Tech Technology Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥2.2b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人士拥有G.Tech Technology Ltd.的大部分股权。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。因此,他们在这个220亿人民币的企业中拥有13亿人民币的股份。大多数人会认为这是一个积极的标志,显示出与股东的强烈联盟。您可以单击此处查看内幕人员是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司拥有19%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能决定大局,但它肯定会对公司的经营产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the G.Tech Technology stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
似乎私有企业拥有G.Tech Technology的16%股份。深入研究这一点可能值得。如果相关方,如内部人员,对其中一家私人公司有兴趣,那么在年度报告中应予以披露。私人公司可能也对该公司有战略兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for G.Tech Technology you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.
尽管考虑到拥有公司的不同群体非常值得,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如:我们已经发现G.Tech Technology的两个警示信号需要注意,其中一个有点令人担忧。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。