share_log

Here's Why Caleres (NYSE:CAL) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

Here's Why Caleres (NYSE:CAL) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

以下是为什么caleres (纽交所: CAL) 有重要的负债负担
Simply Wall St ·  06/10 11:25

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Caleres, Inc. (NYSE:CAL) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

作为投资者,有人认为波动性而不是债务是风险的最佳衡量标准,但是沃伦·巴菲特曾经著名地说过“波动性和风险远远不是同义词。” 当我们思考一个公司的风险程度时,我们总是喜欢看看其使用债务的情况,因为债务负担过重可导致破产。和许多其他公司一样,Caleres,Inc(纽交所:CAL)使用债务。 但真正的问题是,这些债务是否让公司变得更加风险。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什么时候负债才是一个问题?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

当企业无法轻松用自由现金流满足债务和其他负债,乃至无法以有吸引力的价格筹资时,债务和其他负债就变得有风险。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷款人可以接管企业。虽然这种情况并不太常见,但我们经常看到负债的公司因为贷款人强迫他们以困境价格筹集资本而永久稀释股东。通过取代稀释,债务可以成为需要资本以高回报率投资增长的企业极好的工具。当我们考虑企业的债务使用时,我们首先看现金和债务。

What Is Caleres's Net Debt?

Caleres的净债务是多少?

As you can see below, Caleres had US$191.0m of debt at May 2024, down from US$291.5m a year prior. However, it also had US$30.7m in cash, and so its net debt is US$160.3m.

如下所示,Caleres在2024年5月欠债191.0万美元,比一年前的291.5万美元减少了。 然而,它也有307万美元的现金,因此其净债务为160.3万美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:CAL Debt to Equity History June 10th 2024
纽交所:CAL股票的债务与股本历史记录(2024年6月10日)

How Strong Is Caleres' Balance Sheet?

Caleres的资产负债表强度如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Caleres had liabilities of US$764.4m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$519.7m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$30.7m as well as receivables valued at US$164.9m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.09b.

根据最近公布的资产负债表,Caleres在12个月内到期的负债为764.4万美元,超过12个月到期的负债为519.7万美元。 抵消这些义务,它有307万美元的现金以及164.9万美元的应收账款在12个月内到期。 因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款总和1.09亿美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$1.16b. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

这相对于其116亿美元的市值来说是令人担忧的大比例杠杆。 如果贷款人要求其加强资产负债表,股东可能面临严重稀释。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。

Caleres has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.64. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 11.5 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On the other hand, Caleres saw its EBIT drop by 5.0% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Caleres's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Caleres的净债务与EBITDA之比只有0.64,非常保守。而其EBIT轻松覆盖其利息支出,规模为11.5倍。 因此,我们对其超级保守的债务使用感到非常放松。另一方面,Caleres的EBIT在过去12个月中下降了5.0%。 如果收益率继续以这个速度下降,公司可能会更难管理其债务负担。 中心仍然应该放在资产负债表上,然而,更重要的是未来收益,这将决定Caleres的未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。 因此,如果您专注于未来,您可以查看这份免费报告以显示分析师的利润预测。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Caleres's free cash flow amounted to 46% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

最后,虽然记账利润对税务机构来说可能非常好,但贷款人只接受真金白银。 因此,我们总是核实将多少EBIT转化为自由现金流。 在过去三年中,Caleres的自由现金流仅占其EBIT的46%,低于我们的预期。 这种较弱的现金转换使处理负债更加困难。

Our View

我们的观点

Even if we have reservations about how easily Caleres is capable of staying on top of its total liabilities, its interest cover and net debt to EBITDA make us think feel relatively unconcerned. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Caleres is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with Caleres , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

即使我们对Caleres有关于其总负债能否轻松应对的顾虑,但其利息覆盖率和净债务与EBITDA使我们觉得相对不太担心。从上面提到的所有角度来看,我们似乎可以认为,由于债务的原因,Caleres是一项有些风险的投资。并不是所有的风险都是坏事,如果盈利回报很高,它可以提高股票的回报,但这种债务风险值得考虑。毫无疑问,我们最了解负债的是从资产负债表中。 但最终,每个公司都可能包含超出资产负债表之外的风险。我们已经识别出Caleres的1个警告信号,理解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发