Is KINGSEMI (SHSE:688037) Using Too Much Debt?
Is KINGSEMI (SHSE:688037) Using Too Much Debt?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that KINGSEMI Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688037) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
传奇基金经理李录(受查利·芒格支持)曾说,“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受资本的永久损失。”当您考虑评估一家公司的风险性时,考虑到它是否使用债务是很自然的,因为当一家业务崩溃时,通常涉及到债务。我们可以看到,上海金浦半导体有限公司(SHSE:688037)确实在业务中使用了债务,但股东们是否应该担心它在使用债务方面存在问题呢?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
一般来说,当公司无法轻松地通过筹集资本或自身现金流来还清债务时,债务才真正成为一个问题。最糟糕的情况是,如果一家公司无法偿付其债权人,它就会破产。虽然这不是太常见的情况,但我们经常看到负债累累的公司因为债权人强迫他们以低价筹集资本而导致股东权益永久稀释。话虽如此,最常见的情况是公司合理管理其债务并将之用为自己的优势。在考虑一家公司的负债水平时的第一步是将其现金和债务合并考虑。
What Is KINGSEMI's Net Debt?
KINGSEMI的净债务是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 KINGSEMI had debt of CN¥858.8m, up from CN¥168.2m in one year. However, it also had CN¥593.3m in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥265.4m.
下面的图片可以单击以获取更多详细信息,显示在2024年3月,KINGSEMI的债务为8.588亿人民币,比一年前的1.682亿人民币有所增加。然而,它也有5.933亿人民币的现金,因此它的净债务为2.654亿人民币。
How Strong Is KINGSEMI's Balance Sheet?
KINGSEMI的资产负债表显示,其年内到期的负债为13.8亿人民币,之后到期的负债为5.412亿人民币。抵消这些义务,它有5.933亿人民币的现金,以及在12个月内到期的应收账款价值5.007亿人民币。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的组合多823.8亿人民币。
The latest balance sheet data shows that KINGSEMI had liabilities of CN¥1.38b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥541.2m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥593.3m as well as receivables valued at CN¥500.7m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total CN¥823.8m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
当然,KINGSEMI的市值为141亿元人民币,因此这些负债可能是可以管理的。然而,我们认为值得关注其资产负债表的强度,因为它可能会随着时间的推移而发生变化。
Of course, KINGSEMI has a market capitalization of CN¥14.1b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.
KINGSEMI的净债务仅为其EBITDA的1.4倍。而它的EBIT轻松覆盖了其利息费用,大小为382倍。因此,我们对其超级保守的运用债务感到相当放心。好在KINGSEMI的负担不太重,因为其EBIT在过去一年下降了24%。当一家公司看到其收益下降时,有时会发现其与贷款人的关系变得紧张。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
为了考察公司债务与盈利的相对关系,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA)的比值以及其利息支出(利息保障倍数)与利润之前的利润(EBIT)的比值。这种方法的优点是,我们考虑了与债务相关的绝对量(净债务与EBITDA)和实际利息开支(利息保障倍数)的实际利润。
KINGSEMI's net debt is only 1.4 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 382 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. It is just as well that KINGSEMI's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 24% over the last year. When a company sees its earnings tank, it can sometimes find its relationships with its lenders turn sour. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if KINGSEMI can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是明显的起点。但最终业务的未来盈利能力将决定KINGSEMI是否能够随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看此免费报告,其中显示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, KINGSEMI saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最后,一家公司只能用真金白银而不是会计利润偿还债务。因此,逻辑上是查看这些EBIT中的哪一部分与实际自由现金流相匹配的比例。在过去的三年中,KINGSEMI总共看到大量的负自由现金流。虽然这可能是由于为了增长的支出,但这使得债务风险更高。
Our View
我们的观点
Neither KINGSEMI's ability to grow its EBIT nor its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its interest cover tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think KINGSEMI's debt poses some risks to the business. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that KINGSEMI is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...
在考虑到KINGSEMI能否承担更多债务的能力时,既不看好其增长EBIT的能力,也不看好其将EBIT转化为自由现金流的能力。但其利息覆盖率却讲述了一个非常不同的故事,并表明了一些抵抗力。综合考虑上述因素,我们认为KINGSEMI的债务对业务存在一些风险。虽然债务可以提高回报率,但我们认为该公司现在已经拥有足够的杠杆。很明显,在分析债务时,应关注资产负债表。但最终,每家公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范围的风险。请注意,我们的投资分析显示,KINGSEMI显示了2个警告标志,其中有1个让我们有点不舒服...
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
当然,如果你属于那种希望购买没有负债负担的股票的投资者类型,那么今天就不要犹豫,立即查看我们独家的净现金增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。