share_log

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) Insiders Who Own 39% of the Company

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) Insiders Who Own 39% of the Company

最近的回撤一定让拥有公司39%股权房地产投资信托(新加坡交易所:T82U)的内部人员感到沮丧。
Simply Wall St ·  06/12 19:28

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 6 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • 22% of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust is held by Institutions
  • 新兴房地产投资信托基金的重要内部控股意味着既得利益与公司的成长息息相关。
  • 前6大股东拥有公司的52%股份。
  • 22%的新兴房地产投资信托基金由机构持有。

Every investor in Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

新加坡交易所:T82U的所有股东都应该知道最有力的股东群体。持有公司最多股份的群体,准确地说,约占39%的股份,是个别内部股东。换句话说,该股东群体最有可能获得公司的最大利益(或承担最大风险)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.5%.

上周,内部股东遭受了最大的损失,因为股价下跌了4.5%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust.

下图中,我们关注了新兴房地产投资信托基金不同的所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:T82U Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
新加坡交易所:T82U所有权益之分布 (截至2024年6月12日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust?

机构持股能告诉我们什么信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,新兴房地产投资信托基金确实有机构投资者,而且他们持有公司的大部分股份,这表明专业投资者对其具有一定的信誉。但是仅仅依靠这个事实是不够的,因为机构投资者和每个人一样会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出某只股票,那么很可能会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得注意的是新兴房地产投资信托基金过去的收益趋势(如下图所示)。当然,也要考虑其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:T82U Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
新加坡交易所:T82U收益和营业收入增长 (截至2024年6月12日)

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust. Yigang Tang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

对于新兴房地产投资信托基金,对冲基金持有的股份不算多。现任公司最大股东是唐义刚,持有公司15%的股份。同时,第二大和第三大股东各持有公司10%和9.0%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前6大股东持有超过一半的股份登记簿,有一些较小的股东来平衡较大股东的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust

新兴房地产投资信托基金内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful S$1.2b stake in this S$3.1b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们最近的数据显示内部股东拥有新兴房地产投资信托基金的相当比例。非常有意思的是,内部股东在这家市值约31亿新元的公司中拥有有意义的12亿新元的股份。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会和他们一起投资。您可以访问此免费图表以查看内部交易的最新情况。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众--包括零售投资者--拥有公司38%的股权,因此不能轻视。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以在政策决策中左右局势,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管考虑所有制公司的不同群体是值得的,但其他更重要的因素更值得考虑。例如,不断出现的投资风险。我们已经发现了4个警示信号,告诉我们新兴房地产投资信托基金存在不确定的因素,这些应该成为您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发