share_log

After the Recent Decline, Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa's Holdings Have Lost 29% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa's Holdings Have Lost 29% of Their Value

最近下跌后,纳斯达克的Atlas锂矿公司(NASDAQ: ATLX)的首席执行官Marc Fogassa的股份已经贬值29%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 06:19

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over Atlas Lithium implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Atlas Lithium is 12%
  • Atlas Lithium存在重要内部控制,意味着对公司创业板存在既得利益。
  • 该公司总计有4位投资者持有大部分股份,占有52%的所有权。
  • Atlas Lithium的机构持股为12%。

If you want to know who really controls Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 41% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正掌控了Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX),那么你需要看一下股权登记簿的构成情况。个人内部人持有公司的大部分股份,持股比例为41%。换句话说,该群体在投资公司方面面临最大的收益(或亏损)风险。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 29%.

而上周,内部人遭受了最大的损失,因为该股下跌了29%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Atlas Lithium.

下图中,我们放大了Atlas Lithium的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ATLX Ownership Breakdown June 13th 2024
纳斯达克:ATLX 2024年6月13日股权结构的拆分。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Atlas Lithium?

机构所持有的股权告诉我们Atlas Lithium的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Atlas Lithium already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Atlas Lithium, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Atlas Lithium已经有机构在股权登记簿上了。他们确实拥有公司可观的一部分股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看了这支股票,他们喜欢这个公司。但是,像其他人一样,他们可能会错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得注意Atlas Lithium过去的收益轨迹(如下图)。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ATLX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 13th 2024
纳斯达克:ATLX 2024年6月13日盈利和营业收入的增长。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Atlas Lithium. With a 30% stake, CEO Marc Fogassa is the largest shareholder. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Antonis Palikrousis holds about 5.2% of the company stock.

对于Atlas Lithium,对冲基金持有的股份不多。拥有30%的股份,CEO Marc Fogassa是最大的股东。三井物产株式会社是持有13%普通股的第二大股东,Antonis Palikrousis持有公司股份约5.2%。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察发现,前四名股东持有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对该公司的决策有重要的发言权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Atlas Lithium

Atlas Lithium的内部人持股情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计入内部人员。管理层最终向董事会回答。然而,经理往往会成为执行董事会成员,尤其是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Atlas Lithium Corporation. Insiders own US$75m worth of shares in the US$180m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起来内部人拥有Atlas Lithium Corporation的相当大的份额。内部人拥有价值7500万美元的Atlas Lithium的股份。看到内部人如此投资于企业是很好的。有必要检查这些内部人近期是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Atlas Lithium. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常情况下,普通公众持有Atlas Lithium 34%的股份。虽然拥有相当的所有权,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 13% of Atlas Lithium stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前持有Atlas Lithium股份的13%。不能肯定,但这可能是一个战略性的股份。这些企业可能相似或合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Atlas Lithium better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Atlas Lithium (1 is potentially serious) that you should be aware of.

考虑拥有公司股份不同的群体总是很值得的。但是,为了更好地了解Atlas Lithium,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经发现了Atlas Lithium的5个警告信号(1个可能很严重),你应该意识到这些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发